Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover --skill full-agent-takeovergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeoverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover/full-agent-takeover)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover/full-agent-takeover"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover/full-agent-takeover/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover/full-agent-takeover"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover/full-agent-takeover.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00790 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00395 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
full-agent-takeover scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 74 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A e40d91a6c826
full-agent-takeover is a skill published in the GitHub repository thomasthzh/full-agent-takeover (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 790 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
codex-skill-builder
Build, improve, package, and review Codex skills from rough ideas, workflows, scripts, README/API/CLI docs, or existing skill folders. Use when the user wants to create a new Codex skill, convert a repeatable workflow into a reusable skill, scaffold SKILL.md plus references/scripts/assets, validate a skill, or prepare…
clarify-first
Resolve unclear instructions before acting. Ask focused clarification questions until every ambiguity that could change scope, behavior, safety, compatibility, data sources, API contracts, or acceptance criteria is settled. Use whenever a request starts with cf: or cf :, or when the user explicitly requests…
lazarus-mode
Use for expert engineering judgment, "X mode", seasoned/staff/principal standards, robust architecture, security/performance/reliability/scalability scrutiny, optimization review, rigorous implementation/release discipline, or implementation with implement-release-flow. A rigor overlay for design, testing, reviews…
pr-splitter
Analyse an oversized pull request or proposed branch changeset and decompose it into smaller, dependency-aware, independently reviewable pull requests. Use when a PR is too large for effective review or when the user asks to split, stack, or repackage a feature branch without changing its final behaviour. Do not use…
skill-curator
A Chinese-language evaluator for deciding whether developer tools and agent resources are suitable for a curated collection. It checks real repositories, installation paths, activity, duplicates, and security boundaries using evidence.
git-workflow
A guide for handling Git repository work safely, including status checks, branches, commits, pushes, pull requests, and rebasing. Git is a version-control system that records code changes and coordinates work between developers.