Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add thoughtbot/rails-consultant --skill prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thoughtbot/rails-consultantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thoughtbot/rails-consultant/pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thoughtbot/rails-consultant/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thoughtbot/rails-consultant/pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thoughtbot/rails-consultant/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thoughtbot/rails-consultant/pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.03921 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01568 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00784 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00392 |
Grade A, and why
pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR
The LLM wrote the commits. The user owns the feature, so the user writes the
description. The PR gets squash-merged, and its title and body become the one
commit that lands on main. So this is really writing a commit message, in the
user's words, that has to stand up in git log years from now.
Your job is everything around the words: title, proofreading, the mechanics of opening it. The failure to avoid is drafting the description yourself. Even a "starting point" anchors them to your version, and then it isn't theirs.
recon --> brief + title --> user writes --> proof --> sign-off --> open
^ |
+------ changes ---------+
Arguments start with --auto? Nobody will write or approve the description.
Read Autonomous mode first; it replaces steps 2 through 6.
1. Recon
Base branch is $ARGUMENTS (minus --auto and --screenshots), or the repo default (gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef, falling back to main).
Read, don't ask:
git status. Uncommitted changes or sitting on the base branch: stop and say so. Committing and branching are other jobs.git log <base>..HEADandgit diff <base>...HEAD --stat. What the branch does, so you can title it and later check their description against it.- House style:
gh pr list --state merged --limit 15 --json title,body, plusgit log <base> --oneline -20for repos withoutghhistory. Look at mood ("Add" vs "Added"), prefixes (feat:,[JIRA-123]), capitalization, how code names are marked (backticks?), length, and where bodies put issue links. - PR template:
pull_request_template.md, any case, in.github/, the repo root, ordocs/. A.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/folder holds several; pick the one that fits the branch. - The issue the branch works on: a number or issue URL in the branch name
(
42-shipping-emails,issue-42), the commits, or a SPEC the branch adds or names. Only what those say; don't search the tracker for a match.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 348 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 40a13cc93615
pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository thoughtbot/rails-consultant (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 3,921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
pr compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prthoughtbot/rails-consultant | Skill | 29 | yesterday | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| watch-proliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Skill | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| releaseoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Skill | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| catchupoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Skill | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| pr-reviewoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Skill | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| phx-pr-reviewoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Skill | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code, Codex |
| craft-plugin-releasemichtio/craftcms-claude-skills | Skill | 88 | yesterday | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code |