Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/threat-vector-security/guardian-agent/source-driven-developmentnpx skills add Threat-Vector-Security/guardian-agent --skill source-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Threat-Vector-Security/guardian-agentWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00852 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00426 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
source-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source-Driven Development
Overview / When to Use
Ground framework-specific decisions in authoritative sources. Do not rely on model memory for APIs, recommended patterns, deprecations, or migration guidance when the code depends on a specific library or version.
Use this when:
- a request depends on the current best practice for a framework or library
- the user asks for official docs, current guidance, citations, or a documented pattern
- you are writing boilerplate or patterns likely to be copied elsewhere
- the repo version matters for the correctness of the implementation
Do not use this for pure logic, file moves, naming changes, or other work that is stable across versions.
Process
- Detect the stack and exact version from the repo before making framework-specific claims.
- Read
package.json,pyproject.toml,Cargo.toml,go.mod, or the equivalent dependency source. - State the version you found when it affects the answer.
- Read
- Fetch the narrow official source for the exact feature or API.
- Prefer official docs, official migration guides, official changelogs, MDN, or runtime compatibility sources.
- Fetch the specific page for the feature, not the whole documentation site.
- Compare the docs with the current repo conventions before editing.
- If the docs and the codebase disagree, surface the conflict instead of silently choosing one.
- If the version is ambiguous, stop and clarify before writing the pattern.
- Implement only what you can verify.
- Follow the documented API shape and recommended pattern.
- If the docs do not support the pattern, label it
UNVERIFIEDinstead of guessing.
- Cite the source for non-obvious framework decisions.
- Include the exact URL in the response.
- Prefer deep links or anchors when available.
- Verify the real proof surface after the change.
- Run the strongest relevant repo checks, not just the smallest local assertion.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I know this API already." | Framework memory goes stale. One signature or lifecycle change is enough to make the implementation wrong. |
| "Docs lookup is overkill for a small change." | Small framework mistakes become copy-paste templates. They are cheap to prevent and expensive to unwind later. |
| "I'll just hedge and say it might be outdated." | Hedging is not verification. Either cite the official source or mark the pattern unverified. |
| "The repo already does it this way, so I'll follow that." | Existing code can be outdated. Compare the repo pattern with the current official guidance before reinforcing it. |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 74 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A b087f8ac6bb6
source-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository Threat-Vector-Security/guardian-agent (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 852 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
orloj-generator
Interactive scaffold generator for Orloj multi-agent systems. Use this skill whenever someone wants to create, set up, scaffold, bootstrap, or generate an Orloj agent system, pipeline, swarm, or hierarchy. Also trigger when users mention "orlojctl init", ask how to get started with Orloj, want to build a multi-agent…
agentfootprint
Use when building AI agents with agentfootprint — LLMCall, Agent, skills, RAG, memory, control flow, Swarm concepts, mock/anthropic/openai/ollama providers, tools, recorders, resilience, and streaming. Also use when someone asks how agentfootprint works or wants to understand the framework.
billing
Use for refunds, disputed charges, invoices and any billing question.
shipping
Use for delivery estimates, lost parcels and address changes.
agentfootprint
Use when building AI agents with agentfootprint — LLMCall, Agent, skills, RAG, memory, control flow, Swarm concepts, mock/anthropic/openai/ollama providers, tools, recorders, resilience, and streaming. Also use when someone asks how agentfootprint works or wants to understand the framework.
titanclip
Interact with the TitanClip control plane API to manage tasks, coordinate with other agents, and follow company governance. Use when you need to check assignments, update task status, delegate work, post comments, set up or manage routines (recurring scheduled tasks), or call any TitanClip API endpoint. Do NOT use for…