Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/threatrecall/zettelforge/archivenpx skills add ThreatRecall/zettelforge --skill archivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThreatRecall/zettelforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/threatrecall/zettelforge/archive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/threatrecall/zettelforge/archive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/threatrecall/zettelforge/archive.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00097 | $0.01493 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00746 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
zettelforge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ZettelForge v2.0.0: Agentic Memory System
Production-grade memory for CTI analysis. Hybrid TypeDB (STIX 2.1) + LanceDB (vectors). Zero external AI dependencies.
Status (2026-04-10)
All systems operational:
- ✅ Vector retrieval (fastembed, in-memory cosine similarity)
- ✅ Knowledge graph (TypeDB STIX 2.1 with JSONL fallback)
- ✅ Entity extraction (10 types: CVE, actor, tool, campaign, person, location, org, event, activity, temporal)
- ✅ Two-phase extraction pipeline (FactExtractor → MemoryUpdater)
- ✅ Cross-encoder reranking (ms-marco-MiniLM)
- ✅ Synthesis layer (direct_answer, synthesized_brief, timeline_analysis, relationship_map)
- ✅ 36 CTI aliases seeded (APT28/Fancy Bear/Strontium, etc.)
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Score | What it tests |
|---|---|---|
| CTI Retrieval | 75.0% | Attribution, CVE linkage, tools, temporal, multi-hop |
| LOCOMO | 18.0% | Conversational memory recall |
| RAGAS | 78.1% | Retrieval quality (keyword presence) |
Quick Start
from zettelforge import MemoryManager
mm = MemoryManager()
# Store threat intel
note, status = mm.remember(
"APT28 uses Cobalt Strike for lateral movement via CVE-2024-1111",
domain="cti"
)
# Two-phase extraction (selective, deduplicating)
results = mm.remember_with_extraction(
"APT28 dropped DROPBEAR, now exploits edge devices.",
domain="cti"
)
# Ingest reports (auto-chunks)
results = mm.remember_report(
content="Full threat report text...",
source_url="https://example.com/report",
domain="cti"
)
# Retrieve — blended vector + graph, cross-encoder reranked
results = mm.recall("What tools does APT28 use?", k=10)
# Alias resolution works automatically
results = mm.recall_actor("Fancy Bear") # resolves to APT28
# Entity lookups
mm.recall_cve("CVE-2024-3094")
mm.recall_tool("cobalt-strike")
# Graph traversal
paths = mm.traverse_graph("actor", "apt28", max_depth=2)
# Synthesize answers
result = mm.synthesize("Summarize APT28 activity", format="synthesized_brief")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 159 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A b7fcd7b01b75
zettelforge is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThreatRecall/zettelforge (58 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,493 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-messaging
Send, poll, wait for, and acknowledge durable addressed agent-to-agent messages in Aionforge Memory (messagesend, messagepoll, messagewait, messageack) and subscribe to room resources. Use to hand a brief to another agent, page a teammate, wait for a reply, coordinate a multi-agent workflow, or drain an inbox …
memory-bootstrap
One-time setup that lays a foundational Aionforge Memory substrate for a fresh project — resolve identity, seed conventions and architecture decisions as captures, stand up a work-item backlog skeleton, and verify recall. Use when a project's memory is empty or new, or when the user asks to set up, bootstrap…
work-tracking
Track tasks, blockers, TODOs, plans, and follow-ups as durable Aionforge Memory work items. Use proactively when a multi-step task, backlog, plan, or handoff appears, and whenever the user mentions tasks, status, or what is left to do. Work items are persistent and status-tracked, distinct from decaying memory…
memory-capture
Capture durable Aionforge Memory records for decisions, user preferences, project facts, release outcomes, validation results, handoffs, corrections, and reusable failure patterns. Use proactively during substantial work and whenever the user asks to remember or update memory.
memory-loop
Use Aionforge Memory as the working substrate for a multi-step task. Trigger for implementation, debugging, review, release, planning, incidents, handoffs, or any session where prior context and durable follow-up matter.
memory-recall
Search Aionforge Memory before planning, answering, coding, review, debugging, release, or continuation work. Use proactively whenever prior decisions, user preferences, project facts, failures, or handoffs could change the answer.