Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/main/.agents/skills/docs-development-ready/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascriptWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/docs-development-ready)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/docs-development-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/docs-development-ready.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
docs-development-ready scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Development-Ready Documentation Workflow
This is a user-facing workflow for producing the coordinated Type 1 document set required before frontend development begins.
Goal
Produce three aligned documents in dependency order:
- Product / Feature Requirement;
- Functional Specification;
- UI / UX Specification.
The workflow is brownfield-first: establish current project truth before documenting the requested delta. Treat the three documents as one coordinated package, not independent workflows.
Execution
The Primary Controller owns runtime transport and user interaction. Documentation reasoning and authoring belong to one dedicated document child agent configured to use GPT-5.6 Sol.
- Primary Controller resolves the working project and spawns one Document Agent child with the free-form user objective and available project context.
- Keep the same Document Agent child alive across analysis, authoring, review, clarification, revision, approval, and finalization when the runtime permits it.
- The Document Agent loads and executes only its allowlisted document capabilities. The Primary Controller must not perform document capability reasoning itself.
- If the child returns
needs-clarification, Primary Controller asks the consolidated questions, then sends the user's answers back to the same child. - If the child returns
ready-for-approvalafter review passes with no blocking clarification remaining, Primary Controller presents the reviewed package to the user without mutating target documents. - After explicit user approval, Primary Controller relays that approval to the same child so it can finalize only the approved documentation changes.
- When the child returns
finalizedorblocked, Primary Controller captures the result and applies the normal child-agent close/verification lifecycle.
Internal capabilities
The Document Agent owns these internal capabilities and uses them in this order when required by the resolved scope:
document/analysis-> normalizedworking_context;document/product-requirement-authoring->product_requirement;document/functional-spec-authoring->functional_spec;document/uiux-spec-authoring->uiux_spec;document/review-> package-level quality gate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 112 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 79fbee9311ff
docs-development-ready is a skill published in the GitHub repository thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,143 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Run scalable, isolated live QA for nac development. The top-level local orchestrator must parse n (default 4), dispatch one setup worker with this skill, copy its n assignment contracts verbatim into exactly n parallel test workers with this skill, then dispatch one aggregate worker with this skill using all test…
release
Cut and publish a full stable NAC release after main, release-PR, and publication CI pass. Use when a maintainer asks for a stable version bump, tag, or GitHub Release. Never use for release candidates; NAC RC releases are automated.
triage
Triage a GitHub repository's open issues by finding exact duplicates, rejecting evidenceably off-base requests, requesting concrete clarification, applying only existing labels, and opening a linked root-cause issue when multiple reports share one underlying invariant failure. Use when a maintainer asks to triage…
nac-onboarding
Install and configure Arcee AI nac, get the user into the nac dashboard, and connect their MCP client to nac. Use when a user asks to get started with nac, connect nac to an agent, add MCP servers, or expose nac's MCP server to Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or another MCP client.
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke only when the user names autoprompt - typed as /autoprompt or in plain language such as "act in autoprompt mode" - to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Do not infer invocation from…
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke /autoprompt to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Never infer invocation from ordinary requests. Never resume from leftover artifacts without an explicit resume instruction.