Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/main/.agents/skills/frontend-delivery/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascriptWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/frontend-delivery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/frontend-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript/frontend-delivery.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01080 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-delivery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Frontend Delivery Workflow
This is a user-facing workflow entry point. It coordinates agents; it does not contain implementation knowledge.
Intent
Run continuously from the smallest valid workflow entry until acceptance, pause, or a real blocker. Do not stop merely because Jira Tasks/Subtasks were created.
Entry resolution
Resolve the current entry before spawning agents:
NEW: no valid Jira workflow exists for the requested work.RESUME: valid Jira analysis/task tree exists and relevant requirements are unchanged.REPLAN: relevant requirements or approved architecture changed materially.PAUSE: the user explicitly asks to stop/pause an active workflow.ACCEPTANCE: executable work is complete and final acceptance is due.
Natural-language pause intent such as dừng lại, tạm dừng, để mai làm tiếp, or equivalent must route to PAUSE.
Controller execution rule
The Primary Controller owns runtime transport for the whole workflow:
- native child-agent spawn/retry/interrupt/close/verification;
- Jira connector calls requested by Orchestrator;
- cross-agent runtime-resource cleanup supervision.
Orchestrator owns workflow decisions. It must not call native agent lifecycle APIs or Jira directly. It returns controller-actions; the Primary Controller executes them exactly and returns confirmed results to the same Orchestrator child.
Keep one Orchestrator child alive across the active delivery workflow. Do not restart it after every Coding/Testing result.
Continuous delivery
For NEW:
- Primary Controller spawns Brain for bounded requirement analysis and project-stack discovery.
- Capture Brain result, then explicitly close and verify the Brain child.
- Primary Controller spawns one Orchestrator child in planning mode with execution intent
deliverand supplies the approved analysis/Jira context. - Orchestrator returns
status: awaiting-controllerwith exactjira-calland/ordispatch-specialistactions as needed. - Primary Controller executes those actions without changing their intent/payload and sends confirmed action results back to the same Orchestrator child.
- For
dispatch-specialist, Primary Controller applies the native retry policy, collects the specialist result/runtime-resource evidence, ensures owned resources are cleaned, explicitly closes/verifies the specialist child, then returns the result to Orchestrator. - Repeat the controller-action loop until Orchestrator returns a terminal reconciliation result with acceptance inputs ready.
- Close and verify the Orchestrator child.
- Spawn Brain for final acceptance, then close/verify the Brain acceptance child before reporting the workflow complete.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 89 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 0a8604097b19
frontend-delivery is a skill published in the GitHub repository thuandiep1707/codex-harness-javascript (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,080 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage
Triage a GitHub repository's open issues by finding exact duplicates, rejecting evidenceably off-base requests, requesting concrete clarification, applying only existing labels, and opening a linked root-cause issue when multiple reports share one underlying invariant failure. Use when a maintainer asks to triage…
qa
Run scalable, isolated live QA for nac development. The top-level local orchestrator must parse n (default 4), dispatch one setup worker with this skill, copy its n assignment contracts verbatim into exactly n parallel test workers with this skill, then dispatch one aggregate worker with this skill using all test…
release
Cut and publish a full stable NAC release after main, release-PR, and publication CI pass. Use when a maintainer asks for a stable version bump, tag, or GitHub Release. Never use for release candidates; NAC RC releases are automated.
development-team
How the development pod coordinates implementation, QA, and design without skipping gates.
requirements-writer
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
kanban-orchestrator
Kanban orchestrator: decompose, route, verify. No executing.