Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tianemon/easymint/creation-flow-costnpx skills add tianemon/EasyMint --skill creation-flow-costgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tianemon/EasyMintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tianemon/easymint/creation-flow-cost)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tianemon/easymint/creation-flow-cost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tianemon/easymint/creation-flow-cost.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00542 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
creation-flow-cost scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
成本校验与取舍
成本信息默认已在表单采集（部署方式 / AI 集成 / 预算），作为参考，无冲突默认跳过，不主动展开成本话题。仅当功能与成本冲突时才介入。
两条入口
- 表单路径：成本已随表单传给 Mint（部署「本地/云端/混合」、AI 集成「无/AI 辅助/Agent/多 Agent」、预算「充足/少量/免费」）。Mint 在功能共创后对照功能清单校验，无冲突即跳过
- 直接创建路径：用户跳过表单，成本未采集——在对话引导功能共创时一并确认（问一句预算倾向即可），再按下方冲突规则校验
冲突校验（Read cost-map.md 映射表）
按功能清单推导哪些必然产生成本，与用户预算对照。发现矛盾组合主动指出，不装看不见：
- 免费预算 + AI 辅助/Agent/多 Agent → 冲突（需 API key，按量计费）
- 免费预算 + 云端部署 → 冲突（云服务/服务器有费用）
- 免费预算 + 支付/短信/邮件 → 冲突（必然付费服务）
- 商业场景附成本核算 + 合规提示（隐私/支付/数据）+ 维护说明
取舍选项表（冲突时用）
- 不确定项给选项表而非开放问，每项一句话影响，让用户拍板
- 例（AI 对话 + 倾向免费）：A 换免费额度厂商（时效性/限量，适合先体验）/ B 接受成本（轻量每月几块钱）/ C 先砍该功能（以后再加）
- 禁止无脑抛"免费还是付费"空洞选择；免费额度要讲清"有时效性/限量，非长久之计"
- 用户确认的是"取舍"，不是技术选择
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 31 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 60860493bd89
creation-flow-cost is a skill published in the GitHub repository tianemon/EasyMint (24 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 542 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
source-command-audit-whitepapers
Audit version freshness, FR/EN parity, and metadata quality of all whitepapers and recap cards.
audit-agents-skills
Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.
design-patterns
Detect, suggest, and evaluate GoF design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases. Use when refactoring code, applying singleton/factory/observer/strategy patterns, reviewing pattern quality, or finding stack-native alternatives for React, Angular, NestJS, and Vue.
eval-agents
Audit Claude Code agents defined in .claude/agents/ for description specificity, model tier appropriateness, tools scoping, and system prompt quality. Detects dispatch ambiguity between agents, flags over-permissive tool grants, and checks for human-in-the-loop patterns that break programmatic orchestration. Use when…
eval-hooks
Audit Claude Code hooks defined in settings.json files for validity, performance safety, and correctness. Resolves each command against the filesystem, checks exit-code strategy for blocking hooks, flags missing timeouts, and reviews interactive vs async patterns. Use when setting up hooks for the first time…
issue-triage
3-phase issue backlog management with audit, deep analysis, and validated triage actions. Use when triaging GitHub issues, sorting bug reports, cleaning up stale tickets, or detecting duplicate issues. Args: 'all' to analyze all, issue numbers to focus (e.g. '42 57'), 'en'/'fr' for language, no arg = audit only.