Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to timohaa/scopewalker-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/main/.claude/skills/review-changes/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timohaa/scopewalker-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Changes
Review all uncommitted changes against project standards before committing.
Scope
Default: uncommitted changes (the workflow below). If invoked with full, skip
steps 1–2 and run the whole-codebase checks instead:
npm run check # check:versions + lint:fix + typecheck
npx prettier --check src
npm run test
Then check_thresholds and get_code_smells on src/, and report a pass/fail
summary per category (lint, types, format, tests, thresholds) with issue counts
and file:line details for each failure. Skip the diff-based manual review.
Workflow
1. Get changed files
git status --porcelain
Covers modified, staged, and untracked files; untracked new files must be reviewed too, or the missing-tests/missing-docs checks below can't catch them.
2. Review the diff
git diff
git diff --cached
3. Run automated checks
npm run check
npm run test
Use check_thresholds and get_code_smells on changed files.
4. Manual review
Check for issues automation misses. The first three are mechanical markers;
find them with one batched search across the whole changed-file list (e.g. a
single grep -nE 'eslint-disable|@ts-ignore|console\.log' <files>, plus a pass
over the diff you already have for commented-out code), not one search per file.
The last two need judgment; read the changed files for those.
eslint-disableor@ts-ignoreadded without justificationconsole.logleft in (use structured error handling)- Commented-out dead code
- New functionality missing corresponding tests
- New/changed tools missing documentation updates in
TOOLS.mdanddocs/
5. Report
List issues grouped by severity:
- Must fix: Standards violations, bugs, missing tests
- Should fix: Style issues, minor improvements
- Consider: Suggestions, optional improvements
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -3 tokens per session 121c7a7ac3dd
- 8d ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7533988187dc
review-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository timohaa/scopewalker-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-architecture
Audit module coupling, cohesion, hidden dependencies, and design smells. Use when conducting architecture reviews, evaluating design decisions, or identifying structural tech debt.
target-tests
Identify files and functions most needing test coverage based on risk, complexity, and churn. Use when prioritizing test writing or improving coverage strategically.
context
Get complexity and debt metrics before editing code.
plan-refactoring
Identify highest-ROI refactoring targets.
find-bugs
Locate likely bug locations in code.
focus-review
Focus code review on high-risk changes.