Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to timohaa/scopewalker-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/main/.agents/skills/review-changes/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timohaa/scopewalker-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timohaa/scopewalker-mcp/review-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00120 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00048 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Changes
Read the repository Codex workflow adapters, then read and follow the shared review-changes workflow. Apply the adapters to Claude-specific instructions. Resolve workflow paths from the repository root, including when invoked from a subdirectory. Preserve arguments supplied with the invocation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -8 tokens per session 4e095e85f714
- 1mo ago Changed · -61 lines 232cf1eba2d2
- 1mo ago Changed · -3 tokens per session 121c7a7ac3dd
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7533988187dc
review-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository timohaa/scopewalker-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 120 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-architecture
Audit module coupling, cohesion, hidden dependencies, and design smells. Use when conducting architecture reviews, evaluating design decisions, or identifying structural tech debt.
target-tests
Identify files and functions most needing test coverage based on risk, complexity, and churn. Use when prioritizing test writing or improving coverage strategically.
context
Get complexity and debt metrics before editing code.
focus-review
Focus code review on high-risk changes.
plan-refactoring
Identify highest-ROI refactoring targets.
find-bugs
Locate likely bug locations in code.