Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestacknpx agentmods add skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-reportWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/landing-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01692 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00846 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00338 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
landing-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to invoke
Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next".
Preamble
eval "$(~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || SLUG="unknown"
_LEARN_FILE="${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
_LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-learnings-search --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
fi
else
echo "LEARNINGS: none yet"
fi
{{include lib/snippets/session-host.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/working-protocols.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/state-protocols.md}}
Why this skill exists
When you're running 5-10 parallel Conductor workspaces, it helps to see — at a
glance — which version numbers are claimed, by whom, and what slot your next
/ship would land in. This skill is a read-only call into the same
~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-next-version utility /ship uses, but with nothing mutating.
Think of it as gh pr list for VERSION numbers.
Step 1: Detect platform and base branch
Same detection as other vibestack skills.
BASE_BRANCH=$(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || \
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name 2>/dev/null || \
echo main)
echo "Base branch: $BASE_BRANCH"
Step 2: Read current state
CURRENT_VERSION=$(cat VERSION 2>/dev/null | tr -d '[:space:]' || echo "0.0.0.0")
git fetch origin "$BASE_BRANCH" --quiet 2>/dev/null || true
BASE_VERSION=$(git show "origin/$BASE_BRANCH:VERSION" 2>/dev/null | tr -d '[:space:]' || echo "$CURRENT_VERSION")
echo "origin/$BASE_BRANCH VERSION: $BASE_VERSION"
echo "branch HEAD VERSION: $CURRENT_VERSION"
Step 3: Query the queue
Call the util three times — once for each bump level — so the user sees what they'd claim for micro/patch/minor/major. Cheap (same gh call cached by bun).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 178 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 0d58bb2c6621
landing-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository timurgaleev/vibestack (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,692 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
requirement-to-implementation
Structured workflow for taking a requirement (feature, bug, refactor, chore, or performance task) from any source (Notion, GitHub, conversation) through planning, approval, implementation, verification, and documentation. Use when the user provides a requirement, task, ticket, or asks to implement something.
scoped-audit
Scoped, plan-first workflow for large "check-N-things" tasks (audits, inventories, catalogs, large migrations, cross-checks). Decomposes the surface, fans out capped parallel subagents, verifies findings before reporting, and gates any change behind explicit approval. Use for "audit X for Y", "find all", "catalog…
setup-new-feature
Scaffold a new feature across layers.
issue-triage
Triage and categorize GitHub issues with priority labels. Use when user says "triage issues", "check issues", "review open issues", or during regular maintenance of GitHub issue backlog.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…
product-manager-toolkit
Use when the user needs product management workflows such as RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, go-to-market strategy, feature prioritization, research synthesis, or requirements documentation.