Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/specnpx skills add timurgaleev/vibestack --skill specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timurgaleev/vibestack/spec.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.09029 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.04515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01806 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00903 |
Grade A, and why
spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 851 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to invoke
Use when asked to "spec this out", "file an issue", "write up a ticket", "make this a GitHub issue", or "turn this into a backlog item".
Preamble
eval "$(~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || SLUG="unknown"
_LEARN_FILE="${VIBESTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.vibestack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
_LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
~/.vibestack/bin/vibe-learnings-search --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
fi
else
echo "LEARNINGS: none yet"
fi
{{include lib/snippets/session-host.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/decision-brief.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/working-protocols.md}}
{{include lib/snippets/state-protocols.md}}
/spec — Author a Backlog-Ready Spec (issue + optional agent spawn)
You are a principal engineer who refuses to let ambiguous work into the backlog. Your job is to interrogate the user's request — round by round — until you could mass-produce the solution. Then produce a spec so precise that someone unfamiliar with the codebase (or an AI agent) can execute it without a single follow-up question.
You are friendly but relentless. Ambiguity is a bug and you will find it. You push back on scope creep ("That's a separate issue — let's finish this one") and premature solutions ("Before we talk about how, let's lock down what and why"). You think in failure modes: what happens when the input is empty, null, enormous, duplicated, called by the wrong role, or called twice? You never guess — if you don't know something about the codebase, say so and ask, or go read the code. You quantify everything. "Several files" is not acceptable — find the exact count. "Improves performance" is not acceptable — state the metric and target.
HARD GATE: Do NOT produce an issue after the first message. Always start with Phase 1. Do NOT propose implementation. Your only output is a spec — filed as a GitHub issue, archived locally, and optionally piped to a spawned agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +79 lines 0e36e3f23610
- 4d ago First seen · 772 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A f0819a8a785f
spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository timurgaleev/vibestack (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 9,029 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
computer-use
Read and drive native desktop applications through the accessibility layer — list on-screen apps, snapshot one window as a numbered element tree, then click / type / set a value / scroll / drag / run a named action, by element index or by screen coordinates. Use for work in a desktop app rather than a web page. Full…
artifact-deploy
One-click deploy a user's pre-built app/artifact into their OWN AWS account and get a global public HTTPS link (Vercel-like), with a default TTL and promote-to-persistent. Use when the user says "deploy this", "ship this demo", "give me a public link", "share this externally", or "deploy to AWS".
explain-for
Explain a topic, a piece of code, an error, or a design decision calibrated to one named audience — a 5-year-old, a 5th grader, a manager, a designer, a graduate student, a parent. Resolves who the explanation is for (from the request, or from what memory already records about that person), establishes the ground…
rubber-duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…
browser-recording
Record a browser flow as a video/GIF for evidence — animations, transitions, and multi-step interactions that a still screenshot cannot prove. Drives the project's own Playwright through a bundled runner, then converts to mp4 + GIF via ffmpeg. Use when the user asks to record a demo, capture a GIF or video of the UI…
web-verify
Look at your OWN front-end change before claiming it works -- navigate the loopback URL of a dev server or pod you started, screenshot the surface you changed, read the image to judge it, and embed it in chat. Three capture backends: playwright-cli (the session the dashboard Browser panel shows), the agent-browser CLI…