Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to timwuhaotian/the-pair. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/timwuhaotian/the-pair/main/.opencode/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timwuhaotian/the-pairWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/timwuhaotian/the-pair/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timwuhaotian/the-pair/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timwuhaotian/the-pair/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/timwuhaotian/the-pair/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/timwuhaotian/the-pair/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00216 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
What I do
- Review code changes for bugs, security issues, and performance problems
- Check code style and best practices
- Identify potential edge cases
- Suggest specific improvements with code examples
Review checklist
Security
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Authentication/authorization issues
- Sensitive data exposure
- Input validation
Performance
- Inefficient algorithms
- Unnecessary database queries
- Missing indexes
- Memory leaks
- Blocking operations
Code Quality
- Error handling
- Edge cases
- Code duplication
- Naming clarity
- Test coverage
Output format
For each issue found, provide:
- Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Location (file:line)
- Description of the issue
- Specific code fix
- Explanation of why the fix works
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 28656b527c65
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository timwuhaotian/the-pair (384 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 216 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
moai-ref-cross-model-audit
Cross-model audit convergence reference for the plan-auditor and sync-auditor agents. Documents how to invoke the auditmulti MCP tool to fan a code review out across the Claude subscription, codex, and GLM (z.ai) backends, converge their independent verdicts, and fold the resulting per-backend verdicts + disagreement…
gh-pr-review
Automated Cherry Studio review for local branches, PRs, commits, files, architecture docs, and repository skills. Use for code or documentation reviews that need project-specific naming, main/renderer/shared placement and dependency rules, IpcApi and DataApi boundaries, lifecycle/service ownership, renderer hooks…
find-simplifications
Use when asked to find or plan Cherry Studio cleanup, simplification, refactoring, dead-code removal, duplicated state removal, unnecessary APIs, speculative generality, or library replacements, especially when the result should become evidence-backed proposed Agent Notes.
github-review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…
moai-foundation-quality
TRUST 5 quality principles and how MoAI enforces them through agents, the 3-level harness, /moai gate, and sync-auditor scoring. Use for code review, quality gate checks, coverage targets, or TRUST 5 compliance.
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…