Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tincopper/neeko. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tincopper/neeko/main/.agents/skills/trellis-break-loop/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tincopper/neekoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tincopper/neeko/trellis-break-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tincopper/neeko/trellis-break-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tincopper/neeko/trellis-break-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tincopper/neeko/trellis-break-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tincopper/neeko/trellis-break-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01601 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00640 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00320 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
trellis-break-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to trellis-break-loop — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Break the Loop - Deep Bug Analysis
When debug is complete, use this for deep analysis to break the "fix bug -> forget -> repeat" cycle.
Analysis Framework
Analyze the bug you just fixed from these 5 dimensions:
1. Root Cause Category
Which category does this bug belong to?
| Category | Characteristics | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A. Missing Spec | No documentation on how to do it | New feature without checklist |
| B. Cross-Layer Contract | Interface between layers unclear | API returns different format than expected |
| C. Change Propagation Failure | Changed one place, missed others | Changed function signature, missed call sites |
| D. Test Coverage Gap | Unit test passes, integration fails | Works alone, breaks when combined |
| E. Implicit Assumption | Code relies on undocumented assumption | Timestamp seconds vs milliseconds |
2. Why Fixes Failed (if applicable)
If you tried multiple fixes before succeeding, analyze each failure:
- Surface Fix: Fixed symptom, not root cause
- Incomplete Scope: Found root cause, didn't cover all cases
- Tool Limitation: grep missed it, type check wasn't strict
- Mental Model: Kept looking in same layer, didn't think cross-layer
3. Prevention Mechanisms
What mechanisms would prevent this from happening again?
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | Write it down so people know | Update thinking guide |
| Architecture | Make the error impossible structurally | Type-safe wrappers |
| Compile-time | Strict type checking, no escape hatches | Signature change causes compile error |
| Runtime | Monitoring, alerts, scans | Detect orphan entities |
| Test Coverage | E2E tests, integration tests | Verify full flow |
| Code Review | Checklist, PR template | "Did you check X?" |
4. Systematic Expansion
What broader problems does this bug reveal?
- Similar Issues: Where else might this problem exist?
- Design Flaw: Is there a fundamental architecture issue?
- Process Flaw: Is there a development process improvement?
- Knowledge Gap: Is the team missing some understanding?
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 189 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A f5a93699832f
trellis-break-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository tincopper/neeko (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,601 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to trellis-break-loop, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
rubber-duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…
debug-gateway
Load this before concluding a change did not land, and to read what the kirocrew-debug tools actually answered - which question to ask first, the fields that mean the opposite of how they look, and what a 400 / 403 / 404 / 501 from these tools means.
ai-discover
Read-only discovery step of the auto-improvement loop. One bounded agent turn per cycle reads the focus files (Read/Grep/Glob only, no shell, no subagents) and replies with a JSON array of testable surfaces {file, line, symbol, rule, message, hypothesis}; the spine authors fixes and verifies them. Discovery only — no…
debugging-websocket-issues
Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WSERRUNEXPECTEDRSV1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques.
rn-debugging
This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug the app", "fix a crash", "diagnose a blank screen", "read error logs", "troubleshoot CDP connection", "check Metro status", "find native crashes", "inspect network failures", "the app crashed", "I see a blank screen", "the screen is white", "something broke", "app…
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.