Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill codebase-healthgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tinh2/skills-hub-registryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tinh2/skills-hub-registry/codebase-health)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tinh2/skills-hub-registry/codebase-health"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tinh2/skills-hub-registry/codebase-health/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tinh2/skills-hub-registry/codebase-health"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tinh2/skills-hub-registry/codebase-health.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.02773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01386 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-health scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -21 tokens per session f4a3e7890292
- 11d ago First seen · 304 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A e2ce77f57aab
codebase-health is a skill published in the GitHub repository tinh2/skills-hub-registry (16 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,773 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implementing
Process and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.
code-auditor
Performs comprehensive codebase analysis covering architecture, code quality, security, performance, testing, and maintainability. Use when user wants to audit code quality, identify technical debt, find security issues, assess test coverage, or get a codebase health check.
address-pr-feedback
Comprehensively addresses PR feedback by fetching all comments, deploying parallel agents for critical analysis of each suggestion, making implementation decisions, then systematically implementing fixes with incremental commits and browser validation. Use when you need to systematically process and implement all PR…
post-pr-for-review
Generates a contextual Slack message for posting a PR to the team's review channel. Pulls context from PR diff, Linear ticket, session conversation, and related PRs to write a concise, informative review request. Use when sharing a PR for review, posting to the review channel, or preparing a review request message.
address-pr-comments
Fetches unresolved PR comments, categorizes them (must-fix, suggestion, question, nit), proposes fixes or replies for each, and executes approved actions. Use when addressing PR review feedback or when someone requests changes on your PR.
create-pr
Create a well-structured, product-focused pull request.