code-review-graph is a local-first code intelligence graph that builds a persistent structural map of a codebase and supplies relevant context to AI coding tools through MCP and a CLI. It is used for code review and large-repository workflows, with catalogue add-ons providing integrations and instructions for operating it.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tirth8205/code-review-graph --skill review-deltagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tirth8205/code-review-graphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tirth8205/code-review-graph/review-delta)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tirth8205/code-review-graph/review-delta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tirth8205/code-review-graph/review-delta/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tirth8205/code-review-graph/review-delta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tirth8205/code-review-graph/review-delta.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00291 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
review-delta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review-delta — 91% identical, 45 lines differ
What it actually says
Review Delta
Review only the changed code and its blast radius.
Steps
- Call
get_minimal_context_tool(task="review changes"). If it returnsstatus: not_ready, callbuild_or_update_graph_tool()and continue. - Call
detect_changes_tool(detail_level="minimal")for risk-scored changed functions, test gaps and affected flows. Changes come fromgit diffagainstHEAD~1; if the argument names a file, pass it inchanged_files. - Call
get_review_context_tool(detail_level="minimal")when you need source snippets for the changed areas andreview_guidance(untested functions, wide blast radius, inheritance changes). - For each untested high-risk function, confirm with
query_graph_tool(pattern="tests_for", target="<function>"). - Use
detail_level="standard"only for a high-risk item the minimal output leaves unclear. Do not load whole files unless a snippet is not enough.
Report
- Summary: one line
- Risk: low, medium or high, from the blast radius
- Issues: bugs, missing tests, style
- Blast radius: impacted files and functions
- Recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -21 lines 141c520fa4e7
- 1mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 509f8bf787a2
review-delta is a skill published in the GitHub repository tirth8205/code-review-graph (32,264 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 291 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
gentle-ai-work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
ring:generating-pr-descriptions
Generating pull request descriptions from git branch changes with automatic title generation, change-type detection, and smart analysis. Uses branch-only scope to avoid full history analysis. Use when preparing a PR for review. Skip when the PR is a single trivial commit or description already exists.
validate-changes
Evaluate staged changes using LLM-as-a-Judge before committing.
merge-contributor-pr
Take a contributor's pull request that cannot be merged as-is — usually a conflict with main — resolve the blocker without rewriting their commits, and merge it with a merge commit so their authorship survives. Detects the case where the conflict exists because the same feature already landed through another PR, and…
configuring-git-hygiene
Configure safe git workflow hygiene: pre-commit/pre-push hooks, Gitleaks secret scanning, .gitignore rules, local git config, and guardrails. Use when setting up git hooks, gitleaks/git leaks, staged pre-commit checks, pre-push validation, core.hooksPath, .gitignore, or git config best practices. NOT for creating…