Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tjs-w/FlowZone --skill markdown-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tjs-w/FlowZoneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tjs-w/flowzone/markdown-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tjs-w/flowzone/markdown-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tjs-w/flowzone/markdown-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tjs-w/flowzone/markdown-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tjs-w/flowzone/markdown-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01089 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
markdown-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines db520e9e700c
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 235b85a5ce8c
markdown-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tjs-w/FlowZone (0 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,089 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
review
Comprehensive security and correctness audit. Use for review, deep review, thermo nuclear, or thermonuclear requests and branch or PR diff audits.
review-deep
Drive the deep-review phase of an automated PR review. Consumes the walkthrough, runs the deterministic deep-review workflow (parallel lenses → adversarial validation → code-enforced threshold/caps), drafts the surviving findings, and completes the review run.
review-orchestrator
Drive an automated PR review. Produces a structured walkthrough plus inline draft comments via the octomux review CLI. NEVER posts to GitHub directly — publishing is human-gated.
review-pr
Use when reviewing a pull request, posting PR review comments, or when user says /review-pr. Reviews code with parallel agents and posts a pending GitHub review with inline comments.
review-walkthrough
Drive the walkthrough phase of an automated PR review. Produces a structured walkthrough JSON only — no inline comment drafts. The deep-review agent is attached automatically by the server after this agent finishes.