Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tkolleh/skills --skill jiragit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tkolleh/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tkolleh/skills/jira)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tkolleh/skills/jira"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tkolleh/skills/jira/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tkolleh/skills/jira"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tkolleh/skills/jira.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00188 | $0.02826 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00075 | $0.01130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
jira scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Jira CLI
Bridge natural language to a Jira CLI. Portable across users, projects, instances, and auth models — never hardcode project keys, usernames, servers, tenant hostnames, or board IDs.
A user may have more than one Jira instance configured on their machine (e.g. an on-prem/Server/DC instance alongside a separate Cloud tenant), each requiring a different tool and reachable through a different local alias or shell function. Work phases in order for each request. Skip only phases marked optional when their precondition is unmet.
Phase 0 — Pick the right CLI / instance (multi-instance setups only)
Skip this phase entirely if only one Jira CLI is configured — go straight to Prerequisites below.
If more than one is configured:
- Detect what's available — check for both tools before assuming:
command -v jira,command -v acli, and any wrapper shell functions/aliases the user has defined for each instance. List candidates rather than guessing a name:alias | grep -i jiraanddeclare -f | grep -i jira(ortype -aper candidate name) to surface anything ending in or containingjira(e.g. a*jiranaming pattern likeckjira/workjira). If that turns up more than one, ask the user which maps to which instance rather than assuming from the name alone. Do not hardcode specific alias names in the skill — they are user-chosen and machine-specific. - Match the request to an instance — use whatever the user's project/team/board convention already implies (explicit project key prefix, current repo, or a stated instance name). If ambiguous and more than one instance plausibly applies, ask once rather than guessing which instance a write should land on.
- Auth model determines the tool, not preference — this is a hard technical constraint, not a style choice:
- An instance that accepts classic API-token basic or bearer auth → use
jira(jira-cli). Config typically lives at a path set byJIRA_CONFIG_FILEor~/.config/.jira/*.yml; a multi-instance setup may keep one config file per instance and select between them via that env var or a wrapper function. - An instance whose Jira Cloud tenant enforces OAuth (classic token Basic/Bearer auth returns 401/403 regardless of token freshness — this is an org-wide Atlassian security policy on that tenant, not an expired-token problem) → jira-cli's
--auth-type basic|bearer|mtlscannot authenticate at all; useacliinstead, which has a native OAuth 2.0 login flow. Seereferences/acli-jira.md. - If unsure which category an instance falls into,
jira me(or the equivalent auth-status check for the wrapper in use) failing with a 401/403 on a freshly verified token, or an error mentioning OAuth/Connect Session Auth, is the signal to switch tools rather than keep retrying token regeneration.
- An instance that accepts classic API-token basic or bearer auth → use
- Never mix command grammars — jira-cli and acli have different flag shapes for the same intent (positional issue key vs.
--key, different flag names). Once you've picked a tool for this request, use only that tool's syntax for the rest of the exchange. jira-cli syntax is documented inline below and inreferences/{examples,jql,formatting,transitions}.md; acli syntax is documented inreferences/acli-jira.md.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +21 lines · +46 tokens per session 0a7a1b5f03ab
- 1mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A 11e553223f0b
jira is a skill published in the GitHub repository tkolleh/skills (2 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 188 tokens to every session and 2,826 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
meeting-notes
Estructura y formatea notas de reunión siguiendo las mejores prácticas de PM. Úsalo cuando te pidan crear notas de reunión, formatear notas de discusión, capturar elementos de acción, o documentar decisiones de cualquier tipo de reunión. Produce notas estructuradas con decisiones, elementos de acción (responsable +…
incident-postmortem
Escribe un postmortem de incidente estructurado o revisión post-incidente. Úsalo cuando se te pida escribir un postmortem, reporte de incidente, revisión P1/P2, reporte de apagón o RCA (análisis de causa raíz). Produce un postmortem sin culpables con cronología, causa raíz, factores contribuyentes, resumen de impacto…
stakeholder-update
Crear actualizaciones ejecutivas concisas para stakeholders usando el framework BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front). Usa cuando te pidan escribir una actualización de estado, reporte de progreso, comunicación de proyecto o briefing ejecutivo para liderazgo o stakeholders. Produce una actualización encabezada por BLUF con…
technical-debt-register
Documenta y prioriza un backlog de deuda técnica con impacto empresarial, estimaciones de esfuerzo y estrategia de resolución. Úsalo cuando se te pida auditar deuda técnica, crear un registro de deuda, priorizar deuda técnica para un trimestre, documentar atajos arquitectónicos o construir una hoja de ruta de…
cs-health-scorecard
Construir un cuadro de mando de salud del cliente para una cuenta específica. Úsalo cuando te pidan calificar la salud de la cuenta, evaluar el riesgo de renovación, construir un panel de salud o evaluar la probabilidad de que una cuenta se renueve o expanda. Produce un cuadro de mando de salud estructurado con estado…
feature-prioritisation
Aplica marcos de priorización (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) para clasificar características e items del backlog. Úsalo cuando se te pida priorizar características, clasificar un backlog, decidir qué construir a continuación, o evaluar compensaciones entre ideas competidoras. Produce una lista de…