Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tldraw/tldraw --skill write-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tldraw/tldrawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tldraw/tldraw/write-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tldraw/tldraw/write-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tldraw/tldraw/write-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tldraw/tldraw/write-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tldraw/tldraw/write-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.04534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01814 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00907 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00453 |
Grade A, and why
write-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +10 lines 07c94d3be082
- 24d ago Changed 88a89683f22d
- 1mo ago Changed · +50 lines bad777949556
- 1mo ago First seen · 261 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 60c0124453e5
write-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository tldraw/tldraw (50,965 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 4,534 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
refine-canvas-strokes
Design, implement, review, or troubleshoot safe refinement of editable 2D canvas strokes. Use for handwriting smoothing, automatic text layout cleanup, optional font-guided handwriting normalization, freehand cleanup, geometric shape snapping, diagram cleanup, stroke-style normalization, semantic stroke replacement…
Excalidraw
Shapes sketch-style diagrams and editable visual explanations for flows, product ideas, and architecture discussions.
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…