Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tmargolis/career-navigator/pattern-analysisnpx skills add tmargolis/career-navigator --skill pattern-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmargolis/career-navigatorWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00900 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00450 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
pattern-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Invoke the analyst agent to run an outcome pattern analysis on the user's application history.
Workflow
1. Confirm data exists
Application data uses the split layout defined in references/tracker-schema.md — read it before any read or write.
Read {user_dir}/CareerNavigator/tracker.json. The threshold check runs on the summary rows' outcome field alone — do not open detail files yet. If the applications array is empty or has fewer than 3 entries with a resolved outcome (phone_screen, interview, offer, rejected, or inactive):
"You don't have enough outcome data yet for pattern analysis — I need at least a few applications with known results. Keep logging updates via
/career-navigator:track-applicationand run this again once you have more history."
Otherwise, proceed.
2. Load the full history
This analysis needs stage history and note text, and tracker.json alone contains none of it — stage_history[] and notes[] moved to the per-application detail files. Computing conversion, drop-off, or timeline patterns from tracker.json by itself silently produces zeros and reports "no patterns found" when patterns exist.
- Read
{user_dir}/CareerNavigator/tracker.jsonand takeapplications[]. - Iterate every row and load its
detail_file(relative toCareerNavigator/) to get that application'sstage_history[]andnotes[]. Skip a row only whenstage_countandnotes_countare both0. - Where a summary field already answers the question — current stage (
latest_stage), date of the last stage change (latest_stage_date), or a count (stage_count,notes_count,contact_count) — use it instead of re-deriving from the detail file.
3. Invoke analyst — Operation 1
Hand off to the analyst agent with:
CareerNavigator/tracker.json(summary rows) plus the loadedapplications/<application_id>.jsondetail files — pass both; the summary rows alone are not a sufficient input for this operation- The full
artifacts-index.json - The full
CareerNavigator/ExperienceLibrary.json
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 79 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 49b680db5637
pattern-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmargolis/career-navigator (14 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 900 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…