Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tmj-90/gaffer --skill add-api-endpointgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmj-90/gafferWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/add-api-endpoint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/add-api-endpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/add-api-endpoint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/add-api-endpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/add-api-endpoint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01138 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00455 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
add-api-endpoint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add an API endpoint
An endpoint is a contract: method, path, input schema, status codes, response and error bodies, auth rule, and behaviour under retries and concurrent writes. Copy the repo's conventions, validate at the boundary, and prove each acceptance criterion with a route-level test that exercises that criterion's own behaviour.
Steps
- Read the conventions. Call
search_lorefor the routing style, response envelope, error format, auth pattern, pagination and idempotency rules; honour any ADR. Find a sibling endpoint and copy its registration, handler, schema and test layout. If the repo has an OpenAPI document, update it in the same change (theopenapi-contractskill). - Pin the contract before coding. Write down, per AC: method and path, request
schema, success status and body, every error status, and who may call it.
Use HTTP semantics (RFC 9110):
201 Created+Locationfor a create;200with a body or204without.400malformed syntax,422well-formed but semantically invalid (or the repo's single validation status),401unauthenticated,403authenticated but not allowed,404absent (or hidden from this caller),409state conflict,412failedIf-Match,429rate-limited.- Never
200with an error body; never500for bad client input.
- Validate every input at the boundary with the repo's schema library (Zod,
Pydantic, Bean Validation, serde): path, query, headers and body; types, ranges,
lengths, enums. Reject unknown fields if the sibling endpoints do. Errors use the
repo's envelope; if it has none, use RFC 9457 problem details
(
application/problem+json,type,title,status,detail, plus a field-levelerrorslist) (thesecurity-input-validationskill). - Authorise the object, not just the route. Check that this caller may act on this
specific resource (tenant, owner, role) in the handler or service; filter list
queries by the caller's scope (the
security-authzskill). Never return fields the caller may not see; build response DTOs explicitly rather than serialising the model. - Keep the handler thin: parse → validate → authorise → call the service → map to
the response. Business rules live in the service (the
backend-serviceskill). - Make writes safe under retries and concurrency. POST creates that clients may
retry take an idempotency key or rely on a natural unique constraint (the
idempotency-and-retriesskill). Updates that read then write use a version orETag/If-Matchand return409/412on conflict instead of silently overwriting. Anything that writes a shared file or counter follows theconcurrency-and-asyncskill. List endpoints are paginated and bounded (thepagination-and-filteringskill). - Test through the route (the
add-integration-testskill), one test per AC that exercises the AC's own behaviour, plus:- validation: each rejected input class returns the documented status and error body;
- authz: unauthenticated → 401, other tenant/owner → 403/404;
- happy path: status, headers (
Location), exact body shape; - side effects: the row exists after a create, is unchanged after a rejected request;
- where the AC involves writes: N concurrent requests to the same resource keep the
invariant (no 500, no lost update, one row per idempotency key), built with the
concurrency-and-asyncskill's step 9 recipe.
- Run the checks (the
run-testsandrun-lintskills), then evidence each AC with therecord-evidenceskill and stop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +38 lines a9d4d8854800
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 2c8b2610fd41
add-api-endpoint is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmj-90/gaffer (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,138 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bulwark-brainstorm
Role-based brainstorming with dual modes: --scoped (sequential Task tool, 5 roles) and --exploratory (Agent Teams peer debate, 4 roles). Use for feasibility assessment and idea validation.
plan-creation
Create structured implementation plans via a 4-role scrum team (Product Owner, Architect, Eng/Delivery Lead, QA/Critic) with optional Agent Teams peer debate mode.
anthropic-validator
Validates Claude Code assets (skills, hooks, agents, commands, MCP servers, plugins) against official Anthropic standards. Fetches latest docs dynamically and produces structured validation reports.
code-review
Comprehensive code review with distinct aspect based sections. Use when reviewing code, checking for security issues, finding type safety problems, auditing code quality, or when user asks to review code, PRs or changes. Three-phase workflow runs static tools, LLM judgment, and writes diagnostic log.
create-subagent
Generates single-purpose Claude Code sub-agents for use via the Task tool. Use when creating dedicated sub-agents, scaffolding agent definitions, or generating agents with diagnostics and permissions setup.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.