background-jobs

background-jobs is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from tmj-90/gaffer. It costs 80 tokens per session (1,398 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A guide for running work outside the user's request, using a queue and a worker that processes tasks later. It treats retries, delays, partial failures, duplicate delivery, and monitoring as normal cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for sending email later, processing uploads, scheduled or queued work, retry handling, and database outbox jobs.
Why use it?
It prevents lost work and unsafe retries when jobs run on another machine, take a long time, or are delivered more than once.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for sending email later, processing uploads, scheduled or queued work, retry handling, and database outbox jobs.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add tmj-90/gaffer --skill background-jobs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmj-90/gaffer

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for background-jobs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for background-jobs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/background-jobs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,398 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00080 $0.01398
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.00559
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00280
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00140

Measured 16d ago against content hash c7a524ec1a4f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

background-jobs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

runner/skills/background-jobs/SKILL.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Add a background job

A background job is a promise the request made and a worker must keep, later, maybe on another machine, maybe twice. Queues deliver at least once: a worker that crashes, times out or pauses past its visibility window gets its job handed to another worker while it may still finish. Design for redelivery, overlap and partial failure first.

Steps

  1. Use the repo's job system. A queue library (BullMQ, Celery, Sidekiq, River, Hangfire, Quartz), a database-backed queue or outbox, or the platform queue (SQS, Pub/Sub). Call search_lore for it and its retry defaults; never add a second system for one job. Time-driven work belongs to the scheduled-jobs skill.
  2. Keep the payload small and versioned. Identifiers (orderId) and a schema version, never whole objects that will be stale when the job runs. Validate the payload at the worker like any untrusted input; an invalid payload is a permanent failure.
  3. Enqueue atomically with the state change. Write the row and the job in one transaction (a jobs/outbox table in the same database, drained by a relay), or enqueue only after commit. Enqueue-before-commit creates jobs for rows that rolled back; enqueue-after-commit without an outbox loses the job if the process dies in between. An outbox relay either runs as one instance or claims rows with FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED.
  4. Make the handler idempotent. Redelivery is normal. Key the effect on the job id or a natural key: a unique constraint on the result row, a processed-jobs table written in the same transaction as the effect, or a conditional update (… WHERE status = 'pending'). External side effects (email, webhook, charge) pass an idempotency key or go through a deduplicating ledger (the idempotency-and-retries skill).
  5. Fence overlapping workers. If the job holds a lease (visibility timeout, locked_until, a lock row), a paused or slow worker can outlive it while a second worker runs the same job. Heartbeat to extend the lease while working, and make the final write conditional on still owning it, in the same transaction as the job's database effects (UPDATE jobs SET status='done' WHERE id = ? AND lease_token = ?; 0 rows → roll back); a worker whose lease was lost must not commit. Ack or delete the message only after the work commits (acks_late-style), never on receipt. See the concurrency-and-async skill for fencing tokens.
  6. Classify failures and bound retries. Transient (timeouts, connection resets, 502/503/504, 429 honouring Retry-After, deadlocks and serialization failures): retry with exponential backoff, jitter and a maximum attempt count. Permanent (validation, other 4xx, missing row): fail immediately. After the last attempt, move to a dead-letter queue or a failed status with the error, visible and requeueable (the error-handling skill).
  7. Set limits deliberately. Per-job timeout shorter than the visibility window or lease; worker concurrency sized to the downstream's capacity; a poison job isolated so it cannot block the queue; graceful shutdown stops taking jobs and finishes or releases in-flight ones before the deadline.
  8. Instrument it. Log job enqueued/started/succeeded/failed/dead-lettered with the job id, attempt number and the correlation id from the originating request (the structured-logging-and-tracing skill); expose queue depth, age of oldest job, and duration metrics.
  9. Test the lifecycle, one test per AC exercising the AC's own behaviour, plus:
    • the job is enqueued with the state change and absent when the transaction rolls back;
    • the handler run twice with the same job produces one effect;
    • two workers claiming concurrently process it once;
    • a worker paused past its lease cannot commit after resuming, and a worker killed mid-job has its job retried and completed once (the paused- and crashed-holder tests in the concurrency-and-async skill, step 9);
    • a transient failure retries then succeeds; a permanent failure dead-letters without retrying.

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 16d ago Changed · +32 lines c7a524ec1a4f
  2. 19d ago First seen · 63 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A c9134284f068

Subscribe to this mod's changes

background-jobs is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmj-90/gaffer (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,398 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

bulwark-brainstorm

Role-based brainstorming with dual modes: --scoped (sequential Task tool, 5 roles) and --exploratory (Agent Teams peer debate, 4 roles). Use for feasibility assessment and idea validation.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 50 tokens

plan-creation

Create structured implementation plans via a 4-role scrum team (Product Owner, Architect, Eng/Delivery Lead, QA/Critic) with optional Agent Teams peer debate mode.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 38 tokens

anthropic-validator

Validates Claude Code assets (skills, hooks, agents, commands, MCP servers, plugins) against official Anthropic standards. Fetches latest docs dynamically and produces structured validation reports.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 40 tokens

create-subagent

Generates single-purpose Claude Code sub-agents for use via the Task tool. Use when creating dedicated sub-agents, scaffolding agent definitions, or generating agents with diagnostics and permissions setup.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 42 tokens

test-audit

Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 0 tokens

code-review

Comprehensive code review with distinct aspect based sections. Use when reviewing code, checking for security issues, finding type safety problems, auditing code quality, or when user asks to review code, PRs or changes. Three-phase workflow runs static tools, LLM judgment, and writes diagnostic log.

QBall-Inc/the-bulwark · 61 tokens