Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tmj-90/gaffer --skill scheduled-jobsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmj-90/gafferWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/scheduled-jobs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/scheduled-jobs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/scheduled-jobs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/scheduled-jobs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmj-90/gaffer/scheduled-jobs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.01639 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00656 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
scheduled-jobs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add a scheduled job
Scheduled work fails quietly: the tick never fires, two instances fire at once, the job
runs in the wrong zone, or a lock "expires" while its holder is merely paused and two
runs write at once. Gaffer's own builds shipped exactly that last defect: a time-only
stale-lock lease lost an acknowledged write when the holder was paused past the
threshold. Make the schedule explicit, the run idempotent, mutual exclusion enforced at
write time, and absence of a run alertable. Sources: Martin Kleppmann, "How to do
distributed locking" (fencing tokens); PostgreSQL docs on advisory locks and
SKIP LOCKED; Kubernetes CronJob docs ("jobs should be idempotent"); Google SRE Workbook
(alerting on absence).
Steps
- Use the repo's scheduler. Cron library, platform scheduler (Kubernetes CronJob:
set
concurrencyPolicy: ForbidandstartingDeadlineSeconds), a jobs table withnext_run_at, or the queue's delayed jobs. Callsearch_lorefor the convention. Assume any scheduler can fire twice or not at all; the steps below make both harmless. - Write the schedule in UTC unless the meaning is local. A "9am local report" uses a
named IANA zone, never a fixed offset, and has tests for both DST transitions (spring
forward: 02:30 does not exist; fall back: 01:30 happens twice). Avoid
:00when the exact minute does not matter; jitter by a few minutes. - Make each run idempotent and catch-up-safe. Process "everything due up to now"
from a persisted watermark or per-item state (
status,processed_at), not "the last interval" computed from wall-clock arithmetic, so a missed tick is recovered by the next and a double tick does nothing extra. Advance the watermark in the same transaction as the work it covers. Handler shape: thebackground-jobsskill. - Enforce mutual exclusion at write time, not only at start. A lease that expires
by time alone is not exclusion: GC pauses, VM suspension or a stalled event loop can
outlast any TTL, and the paused holder then writes alongside the new one. Pick one:
- Fenced lease: acquiring increments a token,
UPDATE job_lease SET owner=:me, lease_until=:now+:ttl, fence=fence+1 WHERE name=:job AND lease_until < :now RETURNING fence, with:nowfrom the injected clock (ornow()with a tiny TTL in tests); every write the run makes is conditional on that fence still being current, checked with a row-locking statement in the same transaction as the write (UPDATE job_lease … WHERE name=:job AND fence=:fenceorSELECT … FOR UPDATE; zero rows → abort and roll back). A plainSELECTof the fence is check-then-act and does not fence. Renewal checks the fence too; if renewal fails, stop work immediately. - Connection-bound lock:
pg_try_advisory_xact_lock(key)held by the transaction doing the work, or a session advisory lock on a dedicated connection (not through a transaction-mode pooler) that also carries every write the run makes. Postgres releases it when that connection or transaction ends (a long pause can end it via idle timeouts), taking the uncommitted work with it; writes on any other connection or to files are unguarded. - Per-item claims: workers claim rows with
SELECT … FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKEDand commit each item's result in the claiming transaction.
- Fenced lease: acquiring increments a token,
- Bound the run. A timeout shorter than the interval, a maximum batch per run, and a rule for backlog larger than one run (loop to a cap, then stop and report). A nightly job that takes 25 hours overlaps itself forever.
- Record every run. Start, end, items processed, outcome, fence/owner, next run, in
structured logs (the
structured-logging-and-tracingskill) and ajob_runstable or alast_success_timestampmetric. - Alert on absence. The failure mode of a cron is silence. Configure (or document
for the operator) an alert when
now - last_success > interval + slack(a dead man's switch), plus one on consecutive failures.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +41 lines d6ff805548fb
- 19d ago First seen · 63 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 4e9127314c34
scheduled-jobs is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmj-90/gaffer (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,639 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
bulwark-brainstorm
Role-based brainstorming with dual modes: --scoped (sequential Task tool, 5 roles) and --exploratory (Agent Teams peer debate, 4 roles). Use for feasibility assessment and idea validation.
plan-creation
Create structured implementation plans via a 4-role scrum team (Product Owner, Architect, Eng/Delivery Lead, QA/Critic) with optional Agent Teams peer debate mode.
anthropic-validator
Validates Claude Code assets (skills, hooks, agents, commands, MCP servers, plugins) against official Anthropic standards. Fetches latest docs dynamically and produces structured validation reports.
create-subagent
Generates single-purpose Claude Code sub-agents for use via the Task tool. Use when creating dedicated sub-agents, scaffolding agent definitions, or generating agents with diagnostics and permissions setup.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
code-review
Comprehensive code review with distinct aspect based sections. Use when reviewing code, checking for security issues, finding type safety problems, auditing code quality, or when user asks to review code, PRs or changes. Three-phase workflow runs static tools, LLM judgment, and writes diagnostic log.