Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tmusser/ai-engineering-skills --skill ceremony-budgetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmusser/ai-engineering-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmusser/ai-engineering-skills/ceremony-budget)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmusser/ai-engineering-skills/ceremony-budget"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmusser/ai-engineering-skills/ceremony-budget/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmusser/ai-engineering-skills/ceremony-budget"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmusser/ai-engineering-skills/ceremony-budget.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
ceremony-budget scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ceremony Budget
Purpose
Spend ceremony only when it buys back attention or safety. Route a task to a workflow that replaces the default larger route; do not append a second process contract.
When to use
Use when the safe route is not already obvious. If the task or wrapper already supplies an execution-sized route, use it without re-deriving the route.
Inputs
- User request and any task-wrapper instructions
- Scope boundary and expected blast radius
- Verification target and failure risk
- Ambiguity, irreversibility, and resume risk
Workflow
- Check whether the task is bounded, reversible, and already explicit.
- Identify the concrete implementation, reproduction, or inspection action and its proof target.
- Choose the lowest level that protects the actual failure mode.
- Select one replacement route and name only the missing guard, if any.
- Start the next action immediately once the boundary and proof target are clear.
Replacement rule
Ceremony budget selects a route that replaces the default larger workflow. Do not regenerate the full route after a wrapper has already made it explicit. It must not:
- append a second workflow contract to an already explicit route
- restate task-wrapper instructions
- invoke several skills merely because they are available
- require a budget ledger merely to prove ceremony was budgeted
- create process work whose only purpose is documenting the process choice
When an existing route is sufficient, prefer:
Route already explicit; no additional ceremony block needed.
If one guard is missing, provide only that delta:
Route already explicit.
Missing guard: stop after verification and required proof pass.
Next action: implement the named seam.
Startup discipline
For Level 0 and Level 1, do not create a durable planning artifact by default or run commands solely to document route selection. Identify the concrete action, then begin it once the boundary and proof target are clear.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 164 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 3cd9c7096c19
ceremony-budget is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmusser/ai-engineering-skills (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
awsl
Run Claude Code JavaScript Workflows through the awsl compatibility runtime. Use when an agent's current task or loaded Skill requires dispatching a Claude Code Workflow but the host cannot execute that Workflow natively, or when awsl workflow inspection, durable run state, resume, or provider diagnostics are needed.
dwi-all-in-one
Apply the relevant Dwi lenses together when several observed workflow problems co-occur. Select only the lenses the task needs, preserve a silent fast path for clear reversible work, and keep authority and evidence explicit. Prefer a focused module when one issue dominates.
dwi-arc
Structure genuinely multi-agent coding work into bounded cells with one writer per scope, explicit integration, and independent review. Use when several disjoint workstreams justify coordination. Do not use for small tasks, overlapping writers, speculative agent fleets, or process artifacts without demonstrated value.
dwi-bridge
Coordinate bounded work between native Claude and Codex workflows with explicit authority, scope, and evidence. Use for read-only consultation or explicitly authorized execution delegation. Do not create a new connector, share secrets, treat messages as authorization, or allow recursive delegation.
dwi-budget
Set and report practical token, context, time, tool-call, and coordination boundaries for coding-agent work. Use when resource use is unclear or needs a checkpoint. Do not invent measurements, monetary savings, cache benefit, or precision that the harness does not expose.
dwi-evidence
Label coding-agent claims by evidence status, preserve provenance and failures, and separate static, runtime, and human proof. Use before completion, comparison, promotion, or handoff. Do not upgrade observations into guarantees or fabricate missing measurements and approvals.