audit-engine

audit-engine is a skill for Claude Code from TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine. It costs 109 tokens per session (4,074 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for checking whether claims in an academic paper are supported by the paper’s code repository. It compares described datasets, models, measurements, settings, and experiments with what the code actually contains.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a paper alongside its repository and check experiments, datasets, models, metrics, settings, and ablation studies.
Why use it?
Research papers and their code can disagree, leaving experiments unverified or descriptions inaccurate. This review identifies whether each claim is confirmed, partly supported, missing, or mismatched.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Part of the open-academic-paper-machine plugin — 33 skills, 21 commands, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit a paper alongside its repository and check experiments, datasets, models, metrics, settings, and ablation studies.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tobiasblask/open-paper-machine/audit-engine
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine --skill audit-engine
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install open-academic-paper-machine, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills, 21 commands, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit-engine

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobiasblask/open-paper-machine/audit-engine.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobiasblask/open-paper-machine/audit-engine)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobiasblask/open-paper-machine/audit-engine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobiasblask/open-paper-machine/audit-engine.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 109 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,074 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00109 $0.04074
Opus 5 $0.00055 $0.02037
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00815
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00407

Measured 7d ago against content hash fee725c48cf6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit-engine scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/audit-engine/SKILL.md · 416 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orchestration Log: When this skill is activated, append a log entry to outputs/orchestration_log.md:

### Skill Activation: Audit Engine
**Timestamp:** [current date/time]
**Actor:** AI Agent (audit-engine)
**Input:** [paper + repo being audited]
**Output:** [brief summary — e.g., "Audited 18 claims: 12 CONFIRMED, 3 PARTIAL, 2 MISSING, 1 MISMATCH"]

Audit Engine

Core Principle

Papers make claims. Code embodies what was actually done. This engine systematically checks whether the two agree. For every empirical or technical claim in the paper — datasets used, models trained, metrics reported, hyperparameters set, ablations run — the engine locates supporting evidence in the linked repository and classifies the match.

This is the complement to verification-engine, which checks citations against external sources. Audit-engine checks the paper's own claims against the paper's own code. Together they cover both failure modes of LLM-assisted writing: mis-cited prior work and unsupported own-work claims.

Inspired by the /audit command in the Feynman research agent (Companion AI, 2026), adapted to the IS/CS methodological style of this plugin.

When to Activate

  • User says "audit the paper", "check paper vs. code", "verify my experiments", "reproducibility audit", "does the code match what I wrote"
  • Before submitting a paper with an accompanying code release
  • Before open-sourcing the repo of a published paper
  • When reviewing someone else's paper + artifact
  • As optional Phase 7.5 of the paper machine pipeline (after verify-citations, before prepare-submission)

When NOT to Activate

  • The paper has no code artifact (pure theory, position paper, qualitative study without computational analysis) → say so and exit
  • The user wants to verify citations → activate verification-engine instead
  • The user wants to check writing quality → activate the writing-engine /analyze-writing command

Inputs

Required:

  1. Paper sourcepaper.tex, draft.md, or explicit $ARGUMENTS path
  2. Code repository — one of:
    • Local path (./experiments/, ~/repos/myproject)
    • GitHub URL (clone or use gh repo view / WebFetch on raw files)
    • Archive link (Zenodo, OSF) — ask user to download locally first

Read the full file on GitHub · 416 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 416 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A fee725c48cf6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit-engine is a skill published in the GitHub repository TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine (18 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 4,074 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

gemini

Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini…

nowork-studio/notfair-plugin · 184 tokens

audit

Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 35 tokens

phx-pr-review

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 61 tokens

boundaries

Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 33 tokens

challenge

Challenge mode reviews - rigorous questioning before approving changes. Use when you want thorough scrutiny of Ecto changes, LiveView events, OTP designs, or PR readiness.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 34 tokens

triage

Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /phx:review to filter findings before fixing.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 32 tokens