Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turboWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/review-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01699 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00680 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00340 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Plan
Review a plan against structure and scope criteria. Runs internal reviews and /peer-review in parallel by default. Returns combined structured findings.
Step 1: Resolve the Plan
- Plan text in conversation — use it
- Explicit path — read it
- Explicit slug — resolve to
.turbo/plans/<slug>.mdand read it - Single file — Glob
.turbo/plans/*.md. If exactly one file exists, use it - Most recent — most recently modified file
- Legacy fallback —
.turbo/plan.mdif.turbo/plans/does not exist - Nothing found — stop and state that no plan was found to review
When the plan came from a file, state the resolved path before continuing.
Unless the plan came from conversation text, or an explicit path or slug was passed, check whether the resolved plan still describes work that remains to be done. Report a frontmatter status: of done alongside the path.
Step 2: Run Reviews in Parallel
Two reference files carry the criteria, one per internal review:
Skip peer review when instructed (e.g., "without peer review", "no peer", "internal only").
When a list of already-adjudicated findings was supplied (one line each: the finding, its verdict, and the recorded reason), include it in every agent's prompt, internal and peer, labeled as decisions already reached on proposed revisions rather than as established properties of the plan. Direct each agent to treat a finding as listed when it matches one on both location and substance, to raise such a finding again only on evidence its recorded reason does not already account for, and to judge any other finding at the same location on its own merits.
Pass the plan to every agent, internal and peer, the same way: for a plan that is on disk, name its absolute path and direct the agent to read the file in full; for a plan that exists only as conversation text, include that text.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -9 tokens per session 52ea850a02df
- 4d ago Changed 7a27cf9059de
- 1mo ago Changed 0e801340564b
- 1mo ago Changed 2dbca61f4453
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 19a2ba0a6fe3
- 1mo ago Changed b63489996742
- 1mo ago Changed da8e689309c8
- 1mo ago Changed 4f8dff1cb9b2
- 2mo ago Changed 709024c62246
- 2mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 6be7bce01bff
review-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobihagemann/turbo (420 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,699 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
review-plan compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review-plantobihagemann/turbo | Skill | 420 | today | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| offensive-c2-frameworksSnailSploit/Claude-Red | Skill | 11k | yesterday | MIT | A | 250 | Claude Code, Codex |
| offensive-crypto-attacksSnailSploit/Claude-Red | Skill | 11k | yesterday | MIT | A | 261 | Claude Code, Codex |
| offensive-parameter-pollutionSnailSploit/Claude-Red | Skill | 11k | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| offensive-z-waveSnailSploit/Claude-Red | Skill | 11k | yesterday | MIT | A | 113 | Claude Code, Codex |
| fiscalisteromainsimon/paperasse | Skill | 2.6k | today | MIT | A | 306 | Claude Code |
| comptableromainsimon/paperasse | Skill | 2.6k | today | MIT | A | 248 | Claude Code |