Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tobyilee/book-writer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tobyilee/book-writer/main/.claude/skills/research-coordination/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobyilee/book-writerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/research-coordination)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/research-coordination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobyilee/book-writer/research-coordination.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
research-coordination scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Research Coordination
세 명의 리서처를 병렬 스폰하고 결과를 종합해 하나의 레퍼런스 문서를 만드는 조율 스킬이다.
절차
- 리서치 브리프 작성 — 주제, 주요 내용, 대상 독자를 한 문단으로 정리
- 병렬 스폰 —
Agent도구로 3명을run_in_background: true로 호출web-researcher,paper-researcher,community-researchermodel은 지정하지 않는다 (세션 모델을 그대로 상속)- 슬러그와 브리프를 입력으로 전달
- 완료 대기 — 세 에이전트 모두 완료될 때까지 대기 (브리지 도구는 자동 알림)
- 결과 읽기 — 각 에이전트 산출물 읽기
{slug}/research/web.md{slug}/research/papers.md{slug}/research/community.md
- 종합 — 아래 통합 원칙에 따라
01_reference.md작성
통합 원칙
- 주제별 재조직: 소스별로 섞지 말고, "개념", "관점", "사례" 등 주제별로 묶는다
- 중복 제거: 여러 소스에서 같은 주장이 나오면 대표 소스 하나만 인용
- 상충 병기: 관점이 다른 자료는 "관점 A / 관점 B"로 나란히 제시
- 출처 보존: 어떤 주장이 어느 소스에서 왔는지 반드시 표기 (웹 / 논문 / 커뮤니티)
- 커버리지 공백 명시: 수집하지 못한 영역은 "리서치 한계" 섹션에 솔직히 기재
- 신선도 원장: 소스별 발행일·버전 시점("{버전}/{연도} 기준")·검색 시점을
01_reference.md의 "## 신선도 원장" 섹션으로 끌어올린다 — 개별 소스 파일이 정리돼도 fact-checker가 대조할 그라운딩이 레퍼런스 안에 남는다 - 리서치 산출물 보존:
research/web.md·papers.md·community.md는 합성 후에도 삭제하지 않는다 (fact-checker의 1차 대조 근거).01_reference.md와 함께 보존 산출물이다
출력 구조
보존 산출물: 01_reference.md + research/web.md·papers.md·community.md (합성 후에도 모두 보존).
# {주제} 레퍼런스
## 1. 개념과 정의
## 2. 핵심 관점들
## 3. 대표 사례
## 4. 논쟁점·상충 관점
## 5. 실무 적용 팁
## 6. 참고문헌 (URL·DOI 포함)
## 7. 리서치 한계
## 신선도 원장 (소스별 발행일·버전 시점)
품질 기준
- 항목당 최소 3개 이상 소스 참조 (가능한 경우)
- 모든 수치·인용은 원문 출처 표시
- 참고문헌은 저자·연도·제목·URL/DOI 형식 통일
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 56 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A c12302e84f91
research-coordination is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobyilee/book-writer (81 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 862 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…