Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOS --skill shipping-and-launchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/shipping-and-launch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/shipping-and-launch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/shipping-and-launch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/shipping-and-launch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/shipping-and-launch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01716 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00858 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00343 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
shipping-and-launch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<core_principle> Every launch must be reversible, observable, and incremental. The goal is not just to deploy — it's to deploy safely, with monitoring in place and a rollback plan ready before the first user is affected. </core_principle>
<pre_launch_checklist> Complete ALL sections before deploying. A failed item is a blocked deployment.
Code Quality
- All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
- Build succeeds with no errors or warnings
- Code reviewed and approved (
requesting-code-reviewwas executed) - No debug statements or TODO items that must be resolved before launch
- Error handling covers expected failure modes
Security (cross-reference secure-coding-standard)
- No secrets in code or version control
- Dependency audit clean (
npm audit/pip-audit/dotnet list package --vulnerable/ equivalent) — no Critical/High issues - Input validation on all user-facing endpoints
- Authentication and authorization checks in place
- Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS)
- Rate limiting on auth endpoints
- CORS restricted to known origins
Performance (cross-reference performance-optimization)
- No N+1 queries in critical paths
- All list endpoints paginated
- Read-only DB queries skip change tracking where the ORM supports it
- DB indexes in place for critical query paths
- Caching configured for high-frequency reads
Infrastructure
- All environment variables set in production environment
- Database migrations applied (or scripted and ready)
- Health check endpoint exists and responds 200
- Logging and error reporting active and verified
- SSL/TLS configured
Documentation
- Second Brain updated (via
finishing-a-development-branch→ Second Brain ingest) - API documentation current (
api-registry.mdreflects new endpoints) - ADRs written for any new architectural decisions
- Changelog or release notes updated </pre_launch_checklist>
<feature_flag_strategy> Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release. Code enters production inactive; users are enabled incrementally.
Lifecycle:
1. DEPLOY with flag OFF → Code is live but inactive. Zero user impact.
2. ENABLE for team/internal → Test in real production environment, real data.
3. CANARY (5% of users) → Monitor for 24-48h. Compare metrics vs. baseline.
4. GRADUAL ROLLOUT → 25% → 50% → 100%, monitoring at each step.
5. FULL ROLLOUT → 100% of users. Monitor for 1 week.
6. CLEAN UP → Remove flag and dead code path within 2 weeks.
Rules:
- Every flag has a named owner and an expiration date — no orphaned flags
- Never nest feature flags (creates exponential test combinations)
- Always test BOTH flag states (on and off) in CI
- For mobile apps: flags are the primary rollback mechanism since you cannot force app updates </feature_flag_strategy>
<staged_rollout>
Rollout Sequence
1. Deploy to staging → Full test suite + manual smoke test of critical flows
2. Deploy to production → Feature flag OFF. Verify health check, check for new errors.
3. Enable for team → 24-hour internal monitoring window.
4. Canary (5%) → 24-48h window. Compare metrics vs. baseline (see thresholds below).
5. Gradual increase → 25% → 50% → 100%. Same monitoring at each step.
6. Full rollout → Monitor for 1 week. Remove feature flag.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 168 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7cb97ae47b31
shipping-and-launch is a skill published in the GitHub repository tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOS (4 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,716 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
land-and-deploy
Land and deploy workflow. (gstack).
publish-site
Versioned site deploys to GitHub/Cloudflare/Netlify Pages.
ship
Use when code is ready to ship — creates PRs, merges, deploys, and verifies. Handles the full PR-to-production pipeline. Triggers on /ship.
cs-ending-time
Use when the user asks to finish, ship, publish, commit, push, or deploy a completed implementation in one bounded delivery scope.
deploy
Deploy latest master to production with a version tag. Use when releasing to production or tagging a deploy.
land-and-deploy
Land and deploy workflow. Merges the PR, waits for CI and deploy, verifies production health via canary checks. Takes over after /ship creates the PR. Use when: "merge", "land", "deploy", "merge and verify", "land it", "ship it to production". (gstack).