Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOS --skill subagent-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/subagent-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/subagent-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tolgakisaogullari/sumelaos/subagent-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02297 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01149 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00459 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
subagent-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<execution_workflow>
Execute tasks sequentially. DO NOT start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent. Use using-git-worktrees first.
- REVIEW MODE OPT-IN (ask ONCE, before dispatching the first task — STOP and wait for the answer):
- PHASE RULE SYNC (silent, before asking): This skill activates the
implementationphase. Per.sumela/RULE_REGISTRY.md<phase_to_rule_matrix>, confirm every universal rule, every implementation-phase rule, and every rule matching the active stack scope(s) and domain(s) is loaded — READ any missing rule file now; if the registry file is missing, tell the user to run setup — do not guess the matrix. Also confirmsecure-coding-standardis in context. - Present exactly this choice:
"How do you want reviews and task gates during execution?
- Checkpoint mode (recommended): After EVERY task — Stage-1 spec review + Stage-2 quality/security review, then I stop for your approval before the next task. Maximum control, more interruptions.
- Flow mode: Tasks run back-to-back with no per-task reviewer dispatch and no per-task stop. ONE comprehensive review (
requesting-code-review) covers all accumulated changes at the end — that final review is mandatory and cannot be skipped. Best for small/mechanical tasks when you'd rather review once."
- Record the choice for the whole run. The user may switch modes at any task boundary by saying so. NEVER assume Flow mode silently — it requires this explicit opt-in; if the user gives no clear answer, default to Checkpoint mode.
- PHASE RULE SYNC (silent, before asking): This skill activates the
For EVERY task in the plan, follow this strict loop:
-
PREPARE: Read the plan, extract the full text and context for the current task. Note the TDD Mode (Enabled/Skipped) and Security Constraints from the plan header. Do NOT make the subagent read the plan file itself.
-
IMPLEMENTATION (STRICTLY NO COMMITS): Dispatch the Implementer subagent (
./implementer-prompt.md). Match model to task complexity: mechanical implementation → fastest model; integration work → standard model; architecture or security boundaries → most capable model.- Provide the full task text.
- Instruct it to follow the plan's TDD Mode (strict Red-Green-Refactor if Enabled; standard implementation if Skipped, but enforcing the automated test rule for Auth/Security boundaries).
- EXPLICITLY command it to comply with the
secure-coding-standardconstraints. - Instruct it to ONLY stage its changes using
git add. It MUST NOT usegit commit. - If Implementer returns
NEEDS_CONTEXT: Provide the missing context and re-dispatch with the same model. - If Implementer returns
BLOCKED: Assess and act per this matrix — do NOT force the same model to retry without changes:- (a) Context problem (subagent missing info): provide more context, re-dispatch with same model.
- (b) Needs more reasoning (model under-powered for the judgment required): re-dispatch with a more capable model.
- (c) Task too large (subagent cannot hold the scope): break the task into smaller pieces, re-dispatch each.
- (d) Plan itself wrong (architectural decision unguided, spec contradicts itself): escalate to the human; do NOT proceed.
- If Implementer asks questions: Answer them fully before allowing implementation.
- If Implementer returns
DONEorDONE_WITH_CONCERNS: Proceed to Step 3 (Checkpoint mode) or to the FLOW MODE SHORT-CIRCUIT below (Flow mode).
FLOW MODE SHORT-CIRCUIT: If the user chose Flow mode in Step 0, skip Steps 3-4 — mark the task complete in Todo/Checklist, give a one-line progress note (task name + files touched, no stop), and proceed directly to the next task's Step 1; if no task remains, proceed to Step 5. The code stays STAGED; all review weight shifts to the MANDATORY Step 5. Plan ## Checkpoint: blocks: run their verifications, but do not stop unless a verification fails. EXCEPTION: if the Implementer returns DONE_WITH_CONCERNS or the task touches an auth/security boundary, run Stage-1 + Stage-2 AND stop at the per-task approval gate for THAT task even in Flow mode. (NEEDS_CONTEXT/BLOCKED handling in Step 2 is identical in both modes.)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 87 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A f6749aa8702b
subagent-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository tolgakisaogullari/SumelaOS (4 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,297 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…