llm-wiki: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/investigate/SKILL.md

investigate is a skill for Claude Code from tom5610/llm-wiki. It costs 106 tokens per session (1,276 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A step-by-step method for finding the root cause of development problems such as error messages, failed builds, broken tests, configuration issues, or unexpected behaviour.

In plain words
What is it for?
Investigating stack traces and logs, tracing failures to their source, checking project configuration, comparing recent changes, researching expected behaviour, and explaining the likely cause.
Why use it?
It prevents jumping straight to a guess or a fix before understanding what failed and what the system should do. It starts from the reported evidence and checks related files, configuration, and recent changes.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

This is tom5610/llm-wiki's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on llm-wiki itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything llm-wiki configures →

Part of the llm-wiki plugin — 5 skills, 1 hook shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to tom5610/llm-wiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tom5610/llm-wiki/main/.claude/skills/investigate/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tom5610/llm-wiki

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install llm-wiki, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for investigate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for investigate

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tom5610/llm-wiki/investigate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 106 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,276 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00106 $0.01276
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.00638
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00255
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00128

Measured 9d ago against content hash c5ffcbaf392a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

investigate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/investigate/SKILL.md · 83 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Investigate workflow

Perform root cause analysis on a development issue. Use $ARGUMENTS as the error message, problem description, or context if provided (e.g., /investigate Failed to load hooks from hooks.json: expected record, received undefined).

Phase 1: Gather Context

The goal is to understand the problem deeply before jumping to conclusions. Shallow investigation leads to wrong fixes.

  1. Parse the input. Extract from $ARGUMENTS or the conversation:

    • Error messages, codes, and stack traces
    • Which command or operation triggered it
    • File paths mentioned in the error
    • Any context the user provided about what they were doing
  2. Read the relevant files. Start with files directly mentioned in the error, then fan out:

    • The file(s) where the error originates
    • Config files that govern the failing system (e.g., plugin.json, settings.json, pyproject.toml)
    • Related files that might define the expected schema or format
    • Recent git changes if the error is a regression (git log --oneline -10, git diff HEAD~3)
  3. Research the expected behavior. This is the critical step most debugging skips — understanding what should happen before diagnosing what went wrong:

    • Read documentation, schemas, or source code that defines the correct format/behavior
    • Check for examples of the correct pattern elsewhere in the project or in reference implementations
    • If the error involves a third-party tool or framework, use available resources (docs, existing working configs in the project) to understand the contract
  4. If the problem is unclear, ask. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to narrow down before proceeding — but only when genuinely ambiguous. Don't ask about things you can determine by reading code.

    • "When did this start happening?" / "Did it work before?"
    • "Which command produces this error?"
    • "Are there other symptoms or related errors?"

Phase 2: Analyze Root Cause(s)

Think through the problem systematically. Most errors have a single root cause, but some have contributing factors worth surfacing.

Read the full file on GitHub · 83 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 83 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A c5ffcbaf392a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

investigate is a skill published in the GitHub repository tom5610/llm-wiki (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 1,276 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

debug-optimize-lcp

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp · 99 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

diagnose

Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.

emdash-cms/emdash · 43 tokens

repro-admin

Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.

emdash-cms/emdash · 48 tokens

log-error-digest

Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…

zebbern/claude-code-guide · 71 tokens

byted-util-volcengine-detect-retry

An orchestration workflow for Volcengine Cloud Detect, a service that checks websites or network endpoints from test locations.

bytedance/agentkit-samples · 101 tokens