gh-pr-code-review

gh-pr-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from tommyvo/useful-prompts. It costs 24 tokens per session (2,419 once invoked), scanned A, original, Unlicense.

A skill for reviewing a GitHub pull request, a proposed set of code changes, with the GitHub command-line tool. It gathers the request details, full code difference, and automated check results before writing a report.

In plain words
What is it for?
Finding problems in pull-request code, checking its CI results, and producing a prioritized review report.
Why use it?
It makes the review evidence-based by checking the actual changes and whether automated tests or other checks passed. It also organizes suggestions by priority.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Finding problems in pull-request code, checking its CI results, and producing a prioritized review report.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add tommyvo/useful-prompts --skill gh-pr-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tommyvo/useful-prompts

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gh-pr-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gh-pr-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tommyvo/useful-prompts/gh-pr-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 24 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,419 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00024 $0.02419
Opus 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00968
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00484
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00242

Measured 24d ago against content hash 4b37a01f0f3a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gh-pr-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Claude Code/Skills/gh-pr-code-review/SKILL.md · 252 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review GitHub Pull Request

Review a GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI and provide a comprehensive report with suggestions.

CRITICAL: MANDATORY FIRST STEPS

YOU MUST follow these steps IN ORDER. DO NOT skip any step:

Step 1: Get PR Details (MANDATORY)

Use the gh CLI to gather PR information:

  • IF user provides a PR number → Run gh pr view <number> --json title,body,changedFiles,reviews,comments
  • IF no PR number provided → Run gh pr view --json title,body,changedFiles,reviews,comments to get the current branch's PR

DO NOT proceed without PR metadata.

Step 2: Get Code Diff (MANDATORY)

Get the actual code changes using git:

  1. Run gh pr view <number> --json baseRefName,headRefName to get the base and head branch names
  2. Run git fetch origin to ensure remote refs are up to date
  3. Run git diff origin/<baseRefName>...origin/<headRefName> to get all code changes

This is your primary source of truth for the actual code changes.

Step 3: Get CI/CD Status (MANDATORY)

Run gh pr checks <number> to get CI/CD status.

CRITICAL WARNINGS:

  • DO NOT attempt to review the PR without completing Steps 1-3 first
  • DO NOT use context or memory — use ONLY the output from these commands
  • DO NOT modify the PR

Step 4: Additional Context (Optional)

You MAY read relevant files in the workspace for additional context if needed.

Step 5: Choose Review Mode (MANDATORY)

Check the size of the PR: count the changed files and lines, for example with --shortstat on the git diff command you used, or with gh pr view <number> --json additions,deletions,changedFiles. If it touches more than 15 files or more than 800 changed lines, or the user asked for subagents, use parallel subagents as described in Large Reviews: Parallel Subagents below. Otherwise, or if the user asked not to use subagents, review it yourself in a single pass.

Step 6: Generate Report (MANDATORY)

Provide the review report directly in the chat (do NOT create files).

Read the full file on GitHub · 252 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 24d ago Changed 4b37a01f0f3a
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +63 lines 50f8b513bf4f
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 189 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A b7a20ef6368a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gh-pr-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tommyvo/useful-prompts (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,419 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode · 47 tokens

merge-batch

Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute · 46 tokens

otto-pr-review-loop

Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 17 tokens

engram-branch-pr

PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 37 tokens

github-contributor

A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.

daymade/claude-code-skills · 105 tokens

revdiff

Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…

umputun/revdiff · 248 tokens