Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TOMOSIA-VIETNAM/open-pr --skill open-pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TOMOSIA-VIETNAM/open-prWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomosia-vietnam/open-pr/open-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomosia-vietnam/open-pr/open-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomosia-vietnam/open-pr/open-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomosia-vietnam/open-pr/open-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomosia-vietnam/open-pr/open-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00154 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
open-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read../../adapters/root.md(relative to this file) →ROOT+ this platform's tool names.ReadROOT/commands/review.md→ obey VERBATIM, every step, in order. Arguments handed to this skill are that file'sUsage:block.
FORBIDDEN: summarizing, reordering or skipping a step; reviewing from what this file says; treating a tool you lack as a step you may drop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 12 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A d12423c79f9d
open-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TOMOSIA-VIETNAM/open-pr (42 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 154 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-review
Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.
spawn-reviewers
Spawn and collect the reviewer fleet at stage20spawnreviewers. Consumes spawn.json.spec (the authoritative spawn spec from derive-spawn-spec / derive-static-spec), resolves CODEINTELALLOWED, builds per-agent prompts from the per-agent template + role suffixes (Bug Hunter A/B, Unified Auditor, Domain Critics, Impact…
pr-reviewer
Reviews a diff or security scope read-only using evidence-tiered findings, structural and context-error rubrics, and repository review policy. Use when asked to "review my changes", "structural review", "review for AI patterns", or "security audit". For applying fixes use tidy; for UI defects use ui-design.
pr-babysitter
Monitors or repairs an open GitHub PR: CI failures, conflicts, review threads, and merge readiness, reporting state changes. Use when asked to "watch this PR", "fix CI", "resolve conflicts", or "address review comments". For PR metadata use pr-creator; for npm release PRs use autoship.
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.
dx-audit
Audits libraries, CLIs, and SDKs using 38 rules for public contracts, package exports, piped output, errors, and configuration. Use when asked to "audit my CLI", "review my SDK", "make this agent-friendly", or diagnose package type resolution. For agentic product trust use ax-audit; for docs use docs-writing.