Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill analyze-competitiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-competition)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-competition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-competition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-competition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-competition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00405 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
analyze-competition scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Analyze Competition
Maps who else addresses the problem, how they position, and where the gaps are.
The output is positioning opportunities, not feature checklists.
Pairs with research-market and feeds frame-opportunities.
Prerequisites
- Apply the shared PDLC conventions in
skills/pdlc/references/shared.md. problems.mdfromdiscover-problems, or an explicit topic.
Steps
- Enumerate alternatives the target customer could use, including the current default and workarounds (the most common "competitor" is doing nothing).
- For each, capture positioning: who they target, the job they claim to do, their price/range, and their strongest and weakest points.
- Build a positioning map across two axes that matter to the customer (e.g., ease vs. power, price vs. completeness). Identify empty quadrants.
- Identify differentiation opportunities: where the problem is underserved, mis-served, or served for the wrong segment.
- Note moats and switching costs that affect viability, not just desirability.
- Write
competitors.mdto the initiative directory.
Output Format
Use the template at skills/pdlc/templates/initiatives/competitors.md.
Carry the standard initiative frontmatter with phase: discover.
Outcome
If $OUTCOME_YAML is set, emit verdict: drafted.
Completion Checklist
- Current default / do-nothing included as an alternative
- Positioning map with two customer-meaningful axes
- At least one differentiation opportunity identified and tied to a problem
- Switching costs / moats noted
Next Step
Load frame-opportunities once discovery inputs are ready.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · +4 lines 8cb94f175988
- 24d ago Changed 3dae14741b9b
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 0c2b237c46fa
analyze-competition is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 405 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…