Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coveragenpx skills add tomzx/agents --skill analyze-test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01750 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
analyze-test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze Test Coverage
Given a set of code changes, produce a structured test coverage analysis that answers three questions:
- What tests were introduced or modified? (and what behavior does each one verify)
- Is every behavior change covered by a test? (change coverage)
- Is there code that no test exercises at all? (uncovered code)
Changing behavior without a test is a reliable way to lose that behavior in a future refactor. This skill surfaces those risks explicitly.
Prerequisites
- A git worktree or repository with the changes to analyze
- If called by a parent skill,
$WORKTREE_DIRmay be set and the diff context may be provided - If invoked directly,
$1is either a diff ref (e.g.origin/main..HEAD) or a worktree directory
Inputs
The skill accepts its context in one of these forms:
| Source | How |
|---|---|
| Worktree + diff ref | $WORKTREE_DIR set by parent skill; diff is git diff against the base branch |
| Direct invocation with diff ref | $1 is a git ref range (e.g. origin/main..HEAD); run in the current repo |
| Direct invocation with worktree | $1 is a directory path; diff is origin/<base>..HEAD inside that worktree |
From the parent skill, the following may be available:
CHANGED_FILES: list of files changed in the diffDIFF: the full diff textHEAD_COMMIT/SHORT_SHA: the commit being reviewed
If not provided, derive them:
if [ -n "${WORKTREE_DIR:-}" ]; then
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
fi
DIFF_REF="${1:-origin/main..HEAD}"
git diff --name-only "$DIFF_REF"
git diff "$DIFF_REF"
Steps
1. Separate test files from source files
From the changed files list, split into:
- Test files: files matching the project's test conventions (
test_*.py,*_test.py,*.test.ts,*.spec.ts,*_test.go, etc.) - Source files: all other changed files (excluding config, docs, lock files, etc.)
# Identify test files by convention
git diff --name-only "$DIFF_REF" | grep -E '(test_|_test\.|\.test\.|\.spec\.|_test\.go|tests/)' || true
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +60 tokens per session 023d4c5ef034
- 4d ago First seen · 188 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2b8e46632c8a
analyze-test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,750 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…