analyze-test-coverage

analyze-test-coverage is a skill for Claude Code from tomzx/agents. It costs 87 tokens per session (3,020 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review skill that compares changed code with its tests and creates a structured report about tested and untested behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a Git diff or worktree and report new tests, behavior covered by tests, and uncovered code.
Why use it?
It reveals when a code change has no test and identifies code that tests never exercise, reducing the chance that later changes silently break it.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to inspect a Git diff or worktree and report new tests, behavior covered by tests, and uncovered code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill analyze-test-coverage
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-test-coverage

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyze-test-coverage

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 87 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,020 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00087 $0.03020
Opus 5.5 $0.00035 $0.01208
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00604
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00302

Measured 6d ago against content hash 43ec0943f7d3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/analyze-test-coverage/SKILL.md · 274 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyze Test Coverage

Given a set of code changes, produce a structured test coverage analysis that answers three questions:

  1. What tests were introduced or modified? (and what behavior does each one verify)
  2. Is every behavior change covered by a test? (change coverage)
  3. Is there code that no test exercises at all? (uncovered code)

Changing behavior without a test makes it easy to lose that behavior in a future refactor. This skill reports those risks explicitly.

Prerequisites

  • A git worktree or repository with the changes to analyze
  • If called by a parent skill, $WORKTREE_DIR may be set and the diff context may be provided
  • If invoked by review-pr-full, $1 is the PR number and $2 is the repository
  • If invoked directly, $1 is either a diff ref (e.g. origin/main..HEAD) or a worktree directory

Inputs

The skill accepts its context in one of these forms:

Source How
Orchestrated by review-pr-full $1 is the PR number, $2 is $REPO; $WORKTREE_DIR is set; diff is origin/<base>...HEAD inside the worktree
Worktree + diff ref $WORKTREE_DIR set by parent skill; diff is git diff against the base branch
Direct invocation with diff ref $1 is a git ref range (e.g. origin/main..HEAD); run in the current repo
Direct invocation with worktree $1 is a directory path; diff is origin/<base>..HEAD inside that worktree

From the parent skill, the following may be available:

  • CHANGED_FILES: list of files changed in the diff
  • DIFF: the full diff text
  • HEAD_COMMIT / SHORT_SHA: the commit being reviewed

If not provided, derive them:

if [ -n "${WORKTREE_DIR:-}" ]; then
  cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
fi
DIFF_REF="${1:-origin/main..HEAD}"
git diff --name-only "$DIFF_REF"
git diff "$DIFF_REF"

Steps

1. Separate test files from source files

From the changed files list, split into:

  • Test files: files matching the project's test conventions (test_*.py, *_test.py, *.test.ts, *.spec.ts, *_test.go, etc.)
  • Source files: all other changed files (excluding config, docs, lock files, etc.)

Read the full file on GitHub · 274 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed · +13 lines 43ec0943f7d3
  2. 8d ago Changed · +14 lines 40d9496b6d59
  3. 11d ago Changed · +1 lines 718d9bc3b432
  4. 21d ago Changed 774bd2ad25ac
  5. 22d ago Changed · +10 lines 2b9da6a0b762
  6. 24d ago Changed 5132d61dd035
  7. 27d ago Changed 449323ff8e43
  8. 1mo ago Changed · +48 lines · +27 tokens per session e1630ff07185
  9. 1mo ago Changed · +60 tokens per session 023d4c5ef034
  10. 2mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2b8e46632c8a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 3,020 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens