analyze-test-coverage

analyze-test-coverage is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from tomzx/agents. It costs 60 tokens per session (1,750 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review skill that compares changed code with its tests and creates a structured report about tested and untested behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a Git diff or worktree and report new tests, behavior covered by tests, and uncovered code.
Why use it?
It reveals when a code change has no test and identifies code that tests never exercise, reducing the chance that later changes silently break it.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage
Any agent
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill analyze-test-coverage
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agents

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-test-coverage

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/analyze-test-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 60 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,750 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00060 $0.01750
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00875
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00350
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00175

Measured today against content hash 023d4c5ef034, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/analyze-test-coverage/SKILL.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyze Test Coverage

Given a set of code changes, produce a structured test coverage analysis that answers three questions:

  1. What tests were introduced or modified? (and what behavior does each one verify)
  2. Is every behavior change covered by a test? (change coverage)
  3. Is there code that no test exercises at all? (uncovered code)

Changing behavior without a test is a reliable way to lose that behavior in a future refactor. This skill surfaces those risks explicitly.

Prerequisites

  • A git worktree or repository with the changes to analyze
  • If called by a parent skill, $WORKTREE_DIR may be set and the diff context may be provided
  • If invoked directly, $1 is either a diff ref (e.g. origin/main..HEAD) or a worktree directory

Inputs

The skill accepts its context in one of these forms:

Source How
Worktree + diff ref $WORKTREE_DIR set by parent skill; diff is git diff against the base branch
Direct invocation with diff ref $1 is a git ref range (e.g. origin/main..HEAD); run in the current repo
Direct invocation with worktree $1 is a directory path; diff is origin/<base>..HEAD inside that worktree

From the parent skill, the following may be available:

  • CHANGED_FILES: list of files changed in the diff
  • DIFF: the full diff text
  • HEAD_COMMIT / SHORT_SHA: the commit being reviewed

If not provided, derive them:

if [ -n "${WORKTREE_DIR:-}" ]; then
  cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
fi
DIFF_REF="${1:-origin/main..HEAD}"
git diff --name-only "$DIFF_REF"
git diff "$DIFF_REF"

Steps

1. Separate test files from source files

From the changed files list, split into:

  • Test files: files matching the project's test conventions (test_*.py, *_test.py, *.test.ts, *.spec.ts, *_test.go, etc.)
  • Source files: all other changed files (excluding config, docs, lock files, etc.)
# Identify test files by convention
git diff --name-only "$DIFF_REF" | grep -E '(test_|_test\.|\.test\.|\.spec\.|_test\.go|tests/)' || true

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · +60 tokens per session 023d4c5ef034
  2. 4d ago First seen · 188 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2b8e46632c8a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,750 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens