Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill create-observabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/create-observability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/create-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/create-observability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/create-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/create-observability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01814 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00726 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
create-observability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Observability
Defines how a feature's production health will be monitored by identifying log statements, service metrics, distributed traces, and alerts before implementation begins.
Without this step, features go to production with no monitoring: outages go undetected, root causes take hours to find, and on-call engineers lack runbooks.
Is Observability Warranted?
Not every change deserves an observability plan. First decide whether the change introduces production runtime behavior worth monitoring at all: a new endpoint, a background loop, an external dependency, or a failure mode an operator would act on. If it does not (a refactor that only moves code, a schema change with no new runtime path, a documentation change), write nothing and say so.
When it is warranted, define the smallest set that answers "if this number moved, what would I do", and treat alerts.yaml and a full plan as opt-in rather than default.
A single counter or log line is a short section in the specification, not a plan.
Prerequisites
- Apply the shared SDLC conventions in
skills/sdlc/references/shared.md. - If no argument is provided, locate the feature directory under
.sdlc/features/whose frontmatterissuefield references$ISSUE_NUMBER. .sdlc/features/N-<slug>/specification.md(must have passed review with findings verdictapproved), or a specification document provided in context or as a file path ($1).sdlc/features/N-<slug>/lifecycle.md(optional, if a lifecycle document was produced): monitor state transitions, invariant violations, and retention cleanup as part of observability.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/telemetry.md(optional, if a telemetry plan was produced): align observability with business metrics already defined.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/requirements.md(optional, for cross-referencing NFRs like latency and availability targets)
Steps
- Read the specification, lifecycle document (if present), telemetry plan (if present), and requirements.
- Identify the critical paths and failure modes from the specification.
- For each critical path, determine what log entries are needed for debugging.
- Define service-level metrics (counters, histograms, gauges) that reflect system health.
- Identify where distributed traces should be emitted for cross-service flows.
- Define health checks and readiness probes for new services or endpoints.
- Specify alerts with clear conditions, severity, and runbook links, but only for signals an operator would act on.
When the monitoring stack is Prometheus-compatible and an actionable alert exists, write the normative alert definitions to
.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/alerts.yaml(Prometheus rule format, template atskills/sdlc/templates/features/alerts.yaml) and keep the per-alert tables in the document as the human-readable summary. When no signal warrants an alert, skipalerts.yamland say so. Validate best-effort withpromtool check rules alerts.yamlwhen available; a missing tool is skipped, a validation failure is a defect to fix before handoff. - Determine observability infrastructure requirements (existing vs. new instrumentation).
- Write the output to
.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/observability.md(plusalerts.yamlwhen alerts are defined and the stack is Prometheus-compatible).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +10 lines d64a17d7080f
- 22d ago Changed · +4 lines 6e1fb2319a70
- 24d ago Changed 4d92f67fad09
- 2mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A d80f03f6a62c
create-observability is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,814 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…