Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill find-code-duplicationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/find-code-duplication)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/find-code-duplication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/find-code-duplication/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/find-code-duplication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/find-code-duplication.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01952 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
find-code-duplication scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TODAY=!date +%Y-%m-%d
Find Code Duplication
Detects copy-pasted blocks and near-duplicate logic across the codebase and produces a prioritized extraction plan. Duplicated code increases the cost of every future change and is a common source of bugs where a fix is applied in one copy but not others.
Prerequisites
- Working directory is the root of the repository
- Optional:
$1— path to limit the scan (defaults to.) - Language-specific tools (degrades to heuristics if unavailable):
- Any language:
jscpd(npm install -g jscpd) - Python:
pylintsimilarity checker orflake8-bugbear - Java/others:
cpd(from PMD,brew install pmd)
- Any language:
What to Look For
| Type | Description | Threshold to flag |
|---|---|---|
| Exact duplication | Identical code blocks copy-pasted verbatim | ≥ 5 lines |
| Near-duplication | Same structure with minor variations (different variable names, literals) | ≥ 8 lines |
| Structural duplication | Same algorithm implemented independently in multiple places | Judgment |
| Cross-file patterns | The same sequence of operations repeated across many call sites | ≥ 3 occurrences |
Steps
1. Detect Language and Available Tools
find ${1:-.} -type f | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
command -v jscpd && jscpd --version
command -v cpd && cpd --version 2>/dev/null
2. Run Duplication Detector
jscpd (preferred — language-agnostic, handles near-duplicates):
jscpd ${1:-.} \
--min-lines 5 \
--min-tokens 50 \
--reporters console,json \
--output .jscpd-report \
--ignore "**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*,**/node_modules/**,**/.venv/**" \
2>/dev/null | tail -60
Parse the JSON report for the top duplicates:
python3 -c "
import json, sys
try:
data = json.load(open('.jscpd-report/jscpd-report.json'))
dupes = data.get('duplicates', [])
dupes.sort(key=lambda d: d.get('lines', 0), reverse=True)
for d in dupes[:20]:
a = d['firstFile']
b = d['secondFile']
print(f\"{d.get('lines',0):4d} lines {a['name']}:{a['start']} <-> {b['name']}:{b['start']}\")
except: pass
" 2>/dev/null
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · +3 lines 5a251fbe14b2
- 24d ago Changed e64376da0f67
- 1mo ago First seen · 211 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f1c9d12c9bbc
find-code-duplication is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,952 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…