Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill find-complexity-hotspotsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/find-complexity-hotspots)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/find-complexity-hotspots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/find-complexity-hotspots.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01992 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
find-complexity-hotspots scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TODAY=!date +%Y-%m-%d
Complexity Hotspots
Identifies the most complex code in the codebase — by cyclomatic complexity, function length, and nesting depth — and produces targeted refactoring suggestions. Pairs naturally with /analyze-git-churn: files that are both frequently changed and structurally complex are the highest-priority refactoring targets.
Prerequisites
- Working directory is the root of the repository (or a subdirectory)
- Optional:
$1— path to limit the scan (defaults to.) - Language-specific tools installed as available (skill degrades gracefully to heuristics if not present):
- Python:
radon(uv tool install radonorpip install radon) - JavaScript/TypeScript:
complexity-reportoreslintwithcomplexityrule - Go:
gocyclo(go install github.com/fzipp/gocyclo@latest) - Generic fallback: line-count and nesting-depth heuristics via
rg/awk
- Python:
Metrics
| Metric | What it measures | Threshold to flag |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclomatic complexity | Number of independent paths through a function | ≥ 10 |
| Function length | Lines of code in a single function/method | ≥ 50 |
| Nesting depth | Maximum indentation depth inside a function | ≥ 4 levels |
| File length | Total lines in a file | ≥ 500 |
Flag any unit that exceeds any threshold. Rank by the number of thresholds exceeded, then by severity within each metric.
Steps
1. Detect Language and Available Tools
Identify the primary language(s) in the target path:
find ${1:-.} -type f | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
Check for available analysis tools:
command -v radon && radon --version
command -v gocyclo && gocyclo -version
2. Measure Cyclomatic Complexity
Python — radon:
radon cc ${1:-.} -s -a -n C --total-average
Flag anything graded C (complexity 10–14), D (15–19), E (20–24), or F (25+).
Go — gocyclo:
gocyclo -over 10 ${1:-.}
JavaScript/TypeScript — eslint:
npx eslint ${1:-.} --rule '{"complexity": ["warn", 10]}' --format compact 2>/dev/null | rg complexity
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 201 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 356fc8245fb1
find-complexity-hotspots is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,992 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…