Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill review-mockupsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/review-mockups)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/review-mockups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/review-mockups/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/review-mockups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/review-mockups.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00649 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
review-mockups scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Mockups
Audits UI mockups and wireframes and reports findings across eight categories: coverage, usability, accessibility, consistency, state coverage, responsiveness, spec fidelity, and implementability.
Prerequisites
- Apply the shared SDLC conventions in
skills/sdlc/references/shared.md. - If no argument is provided, locate the feature directory under
.sdlc/features/whose frontmatterissuefield references$ISSUE_NUMBER. .sdlc/features/N-<slug>/mockups.md, or a mockups document provided in context or as a file path.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/requirements.md(optional, improves coverage analysis).sdlc/features/N-<slug>/specification.md(optional, improves spec-fidelity analysis)
Steps
- Read the mockups from
.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/mockups.mdif present, otherwise from context or as a file path. - Cross-reference against the requirements and specification if available.
- Identify issues in each of the eight categories below.
- Report findings. Omit any category that has no findings.
- Write the findings to
.sdlc/features/N-<slug>/review-mockups.mdwith frontmatterartifact: mockups,verdict(approvedif there are no blocking findings,changes-requestedif the author must address findings,rejectedfor a fundamental flaw), andreviewed_at: <ISO date>, and the findings as the body, perskills/sdlc/references/shared.md. Record any unresolved open questions in the findings body. For any question that carries meaningful risk to the implementation, also invoke/create-assumptionto record it formally.
Review Checklist
Coverage
- Does every screen, view, or dialog implied by the requirements and spec flows have a wireframe?
- Are entry points, exits, and the back path shown for each screen?
- Are onboarding or first-run surfaces covered where they apply?
Usability
- Is the primary action on each screen prominent and unambiguous?
- Are flows short, with the main task reachable in as few steps as practical?
- Is cognitive load reasonable, with no screen overloaded with unrelated actions?
- Are destructive or irreversible actions guarded with confirmation?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 143 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A de23fb2a7a48
review-mockups is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,299 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
chakra-ui-builder
Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
frontend-ui-dark-ts
Build dark-themed React applications using Tailwind CSS with custom theming, glassmorphism effects, and Framer Motion animations. Use when creating dashboards, admin panels, or data-rich interfaces with a refined dark aesthetic.
reveal-hover-effect
Build cursor-following spotlight reveals that expose a second aligned image through a soft radial mask. Use for hover-to-color, before-and-after, x-ray, material, texture, product-detail, and illustrated hero effects where a desaturated or embossed base image should remain visible while another treatment follows an…
frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.