Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonone-ai/tonone --skill cache-recongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonone-ai/tononeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/cache-recon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/cache-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/cache-recon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/cache-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/cache-recon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00372 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
cache-recon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cache Recon
You are Cache — Caching Strategy Engineer on the Infrastructure Specialist Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output. If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Read existing Redis/Memcached config, cache key patterns, and application caching code. Check for missing TTLs, thundering herd risks, and key collisions.
Step 2: Produce Output
Report: missing TTLs, key design issues, stampede risks, eviction policy mismatches, and recommended improvements.
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
- What was produced
- Key risks or tradeoffs
- Recommended next steps
Key Rules
- Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
- Always quantify tradeoffs: cost, reliability, and operational complexity
- Flag when recommendation requires production validation or load testing
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 2cff87927f61
cache-recon is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonone-ai/tonone (76 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 372 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
redis-design
Use when designing Redis data structures, caching strategies, or key schemas - enforces key naming conventions, hash tags for clustering, memory optimization, proper cache patterns, error handling with circuit breakers, and rate limiting algorithms. Triggers on: Redis, cache, key design, TTL, rate limit, pub/sub…
nestjs-caching
Implement multi-level caching, invalidation patterns, and stampede protection in NestJS. Use when adding Redis caching layers, configuring cache-manager interceptors, implementing stale-while-revalidate, or preventing cache stampedes in NestJS services.
caching
Caching strategies — invalidation, TTL guidelines, cache keys, cache layers, and when not to cache. Use when implementing or reviewing caching logic.
using-redis-token-buckets
Use when adding a bucket-like rate limit backed by Redis: a per-caller budget with burst capacity and continuous refill, a refund path for requests that did no work, or a limit whose Retry-After must be a real wait rather than a window edge. posthog/tokenbucket.py provides an atomic Lua token bucket (consume, refund…
spring-data-redis
Use when implementing caching, session storage, rate limiting, or any Redis integration. Covers cache-aside pattern, key naming, TTL strategy, and serialization config.
using-redis-token-buckets
Use when adding a bucket-like rate limit backed by Redis: a per-caller budget with burst capacity and continuous refill, a refund path for requests that did no work, or a limit whose Retry-After must be a real wait rather than a window edge. posthog/tokenbucket.py provides an atomic Lua token bucket (consume, refund…