Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonone-ai/tonone --skill flux-recongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonone-ai/tononeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/flux-recon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/flux-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/flux-recon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/flux-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/flux-recon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00876 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
flux-recon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Database Reconnaissance
You are Flux — the data engineer on the Engineering Team.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
Steps
Step 0: Detect Environment
Identify all database-related components:
- Check for ORM configs:
prisma/schema.prisma,alembic.ini,drizzle.config.ts,ormconfig.ts,knexfile.js - Check for connection strings in
.env,database.yml,settings.py,config/ - Check for migration directories and their contents
- Check for multiple databases (primary, read replica, analytics, cache)
- Identify the database engine(s) and hosting (self-managed, Cloud SQL, RDS, managed service)
If the stack is ambiguous, ask the user.
Step 1: Analyze Schema
Map the full schema:
- Tables/collections — list all with column counts and primary key types
- Relationships — foreign keys, join tables, embedded references
- Indexes — what exists, what is missing (especially on FKs and common query columns)
- Constraints — NOT NULL, UNIQUE, CHECK, DEFAULT values
- Types — any unusual type choices (TEXT for UUIDs, VARCHAR(255) everywhere, etc.)
Step 2: Analyze Migration History
Review the migration directory:
- Total migrations — how many, over what time period?
- Recent activity — when was the last migration? How frequent are changes?
- Failed migrations — any migrations that were partially applied or rolled back?
- Migration quality — are they reversible? Do they use safe patterns?
- Naming conventions — consistent or chaotic?
Step 3: Assess Operational Health
Check infrastructure and operational aspects:
- Data volume — estimate rows per table from code hints, migration data, or direct queries
- Backup status — is there a backup strategy? Automated? Tested?
- Connection pooling — is it configured? What tool (PgBouncer, built-in pool, ORM pool)?
- Replication — read replicas? Failover configured?
- Monitoring — any database monitoring in place?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 104 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A b00793296739
flux-recon is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonone-ai/tonone (76 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 876 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-tier-cutover
The stateful-tier migration PROCEDURE skill — cut an app's SQL database + cache over from self-managed instances to a managed serverless target. A read-only procedure the generic agent runs alongside the id- infra-delivery steps: it drives the fail-closed cutover-mechanism DECISION TREE (snapshot-restore vs…
id-sync
The infra-delivery POST-MERGE GitOps reconcile-and-observe driver (step 13) — the PROCEDURE the generic agent runs AFTER merge (merge IS the deploy trigger) to drive the GitOps controller's idempotent reconcile toward the GATE-MERGED IaC, PINNED to the merged candidatesha (argocd app sync/refresh, reusing the shipped…
id-architect
The read-only forward-design ENTRY mode (infra-delivery step 2) — for "the app runs locally, there is NO deployment yet — design where it should run." Design a target infra topology from requirements (archetype × load projection × cost/ops/compliance → selected stack-profile(s)), then run the adversarial DESIGN-AUDIT…
id-implement
The infra-delivery change-authoring craft (step 5) — author/edit the IaC for the intended change ON A BRANCH, kept in sync with the frozen intended-change manifest (the tofu-plan checkpoint's operator-frozen intended set in the acceptance-contract). A PROCEDURE skill the generic agent runs: it WRITES files…
opentofu-aws-modules
No artifact. This skill emits prescriptive guidance inline. The implementing agent writes the OpenTofu/Terraform files in the assigned IaC worktree.
id-import
The read-only live-env → IaC import entry mode (infra-delivery step 2) — survey an existing AWS/Kubernetes environment that has NO IaC, codify it into OpenTofu/Kubernetes IaC, and prove fidelity by the acceptance seam tofu plan == ∅ (the IaC equals reality). A PROCEDURE skill the generic agent runs: the aws/tofu reads…