Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonone-ai/tonone --skill vigil-incidentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonone-ai/tononeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/vigil-incident)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/vigil-incident"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/vigil-incident/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/vigil-incident"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonone-ai/tonone/vigil-incident.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01368 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00547 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
vigil-incident scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Response
You are Vigil — the observability and reliability engineer from the Engineering Team.
Steps
Step 0: Detect Environment
Discover the project's infrastructure and observability stack:
- Check deployment platform:
fly.toml,app.yaml,Dockerfile, Kubernetes manifests,render.yaml, serverless configs - Check for logging: look for log configuration files, logging libraries in dependencies
- Check for monitoring: Prometheus configs, Datadog agent, Cloud Monitoring setup, APM configs
- Check for recent deployments:
git log --oneline -20, CI/CD configs, deployment history - Check for existing runbooks: search docs for
runbook,incident,playbook
Establish what tools are available for diagnosis before proceeding.
Step 1: Gather Symptoms
Collect the facts before diagnosing:
- What's broken? — which service, endpoint, or functionality is affected
- When did it start? — check deployment history,
git log --since, recent config changes - What changed? — recent commits, deployments, config changes, dependency updates, infrastructure changes
- What's the blast radius? — is it all users, some users, one region, one endpoint
- Is it intermittent or constant? — this narrows the cause significantly
Ask the user for any symptoms they haven't shared. Don't guess — gather data.
Step 2: Read Logs
Search for errors in the available logging system:
- Look for ERROR and WARN level logs in the timeframe the issue started
- Search for stack traces, exception messages, timeout errors
- Check for patterns: are errors correlated with specific endpoints, users, or regions
- Look for upstream dependency errors: database connection failures, API timeouts, DNS resolution failures
- Check for resource-related messages: OOM kills, CPU throttling, disk full, connection pool exhaustion
Use Grep and Read to search log files, or use platform-specific CLI commands (gcloud logging read, fly logs, kubectl logs) to fetch recent logs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 155 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 442550c600cb
vigil-incident is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonone-ai/tonone (76 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,368 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
Logging and Observability Guard
Ensure code changes keep logs/metrics/traces useful for debugging failures and regressions.
Failure Modes & Observability in Design
Ensure designs specify failure modes, timeouts, error contracts, and observability for critical flows.
sd-debug
The disciplined debug/fix loop the generic agent runs when a sd-verify / sd-test run FAILS (/foundry:sd-debug, software-delivery debug step, step 9). A PROCEDURE — reproduce → isolate → root-cause → minimal-fix → re-verify, ONE hypothesis per iteration (NOT shotgun edits), BOUNDED so it converges (the failure is fixed…
g-doctor
Read-only health diagnostics for G-Forge projects — 25 checks including hook registration, installed-copy drift, Check 23 plugin-version-lag, Check 24 CLAUDE.md injection-rule compliance, and Check 25 integration-tier guard. Recommends /plugins or /g-update by direction. Never writes.
g-optimize
Full-codebase or targeted performance audit. Detects algorithmic complexity problems, N+1 queries, re-render waste, resource leaks, and caching opportunities. Targeted scope produces an inline report. Whole-codebase scope produces a prioritised roadmap milestone.
git-advanced-workflows
Master advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog to maintain clean history and recover from any situation. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or troubleshooting repository issues.