A review process for an implemented code change that compares the diff with its intended purpose and looks for defects. It uses several review approaches, challenges possible findings, and gives a verdict without editing files.

Use it after implementation, when explicitly requested, to review the change and report findings only.

It helps find problems or mismatches before a change is accepted, while keeping the review separate from making fixes.

code-review — Skill for Claude Code by tony-adamson/groundwork

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add tony-adamson/groundwork --skill code-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tony-adamson/groundwork

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tony-adamson/groundwork/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,096 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00057	$0.01096
Opus 5.5	$0.00023	$0.00438
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00011	$0.00219
Haiku 4.5	$0.00006	$0.00110

Measured 16d ago against content hash c25d591f1058, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (review.workflow.js), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

dsh/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 45 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

review.workflow.js 11 KB runs code

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

16d ago Changed c25d591f1058
17d ago First seen · 45 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A eff4181278e6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tony-adamson/groundwork (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,096 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.

Claude Code Code review LLM agent-skills ai-agents codex developer-tools

code-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
code-reviewtony-adamson/groundwork	Skill	3	10d ago	none	A	57	Claude Code
requesting-code-reviewNousResearch/hermes-agent	Skill	261k	yesterday	MIT	A	20	Claude Code, Codex
otto-pr-review-loopomnigent-ai/omnigent	Skill	11k	yesterday	Apache-2.0	A	17	Claude Code, Codex
architecture-reviewlangwatch/langwatch	Skill	5.0k	yesterday	Apache-2.0	A	172	Claude Code
meta-codereview-current-diffopensquilla/opensquilla	Skill	7.1k	6d ago	Apache-2.0	A	73	Claude Code, Codex
prs-awaiting-maintainerdyoshikawa/rulesync	Skill	1.6k	yesterday	MIT	A	56	Claude Code, Codex
review-exportSnowflake-Labs/cocoplus	Skill	727	2d ago	MIT	A	0	Claude Code