Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit --skill geminigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/gemini)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/gemini/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit/gemini.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01402 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00561 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00140 |
Grade B, and why
gemini scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
(`~/.gemini/settings.json` → `security.auth.selectedType: "gemini-api-key"`). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
gemini — the third vendor in the "second pair of eyes"
Its siblings: Codex (secondop.py / codex_review.py, the default) and Grok
(grok_review.py, a CLI on the hub). Gemini is the third independent vendor: it rescues the
verdict when Codex has burned through its quota, and as a hetero-pair it breaks what the other two
never saw.
When I call it
- In /tt Step 2.5, rail 3: Codex unavailable/quota-blocked · a contested COUNTER · a safety-critical artifact (call two or three of them) · the operator says "ask Gemini".
- Diff review alongside
cc_review.py/codex_review.py/grok_review.py. - A third voice on architecture/plan review when Claude and Codex disagree.
How (headless, no browser)
The breaker for /tt (the verdict is logged into secondop automatically, no manual log-ext needed):
python "%USERPROFILE%\.claude\scripts\cc-review\gemini_review.py" break --task <task-id> --context "<what we built + what has already been checked>"
Diff review:
python "%USERPROFILE%\.claude\scripts\cc-review\gemini_review.py" review --repo "<path to the repo>"
Is the rail alive (before the ritual leans on it):
python "%USERPROFILE%\.claude\scripts\cc-review\gemini_review.py" doctor
Flags: --range "HEAD~1 HEAD" · --diff <patch> · --task <task.md> (what was asked for) ·
--model <model> · --engine cli|rest · --timeout S · --no-log (break without writing to usage.jsonl).
How to read the answer
break: the first line isACCEPT(agreement) ·COUNTER/BLOCK(a finding → that is /tt Step 4: root cause → fix → re-run, not "an opinion noted for the record"). An unrecognized verdict → exit 3, the external eye does NOT count (ask again in the right format, or log an explicitlog-skip).review:VERDICT: APPROVE | REQUEST_CHANGES+ a reportreview-gemini-<ts>.mdnext to the repo.- The rail did not answer → the script writes a skip into
usage.jsonlitself and prints ⚠️: the /tt verdict is then ⚠️ PARTIAL at best, never ✅. A missed call ≠ a green test.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed b1e5e4d809fd
- 15d ago Changed · -1 lines 0bb6cba2fba3
- 20d ago Changed · -24 lines · -74 tokens per session 35df1229de21
- 21d ago Changed f521d43441e7
- 29d ago Changed · +22 lines · +74 tokens per session 9f16e9e8d702
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · -31 tokens per session 92ab8015f722
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 105 tokens per session scan B dd4945b362bf
gemini is a skill published in the GitHub repository tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,402 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
lint
A health check for the LLM Wiki, a knowledge base about large language models. It looks for missing pages, broken links, conflicting or outdated content, missing fields, incomplete topic maps, weak bias checks, and an old core-context snapshot.
wiki-mode
Read or configure the vault filing methodology and suggest destinations for planned knowledge creation under Generic, LYT, PARA, or Zettelkasten. Use for wiki mode, methodology mode, what is my vault mode, set vault mode, switch to PARA, use LYT, Zettelkasten setup, change mode, configure mode, or methodology routing.…
wiki
Initialize, adopt, and route work for a separate Obsidian knowledge vault through the portable claude-obsidian core. Use for vault setup, scaffolding, workspace selection, cross-project configuration, or choosing the correct wiki sub-skill. Triggers: /wiki, set up wiki, scaffold vault, create knowledge base, adopt…
defuddle
Plan optional Defuddle extraction and retain already available local source files through reviewed filesystem capture. Use for defuddle, clean this URL, strip page clutter, readable Markdown from a web page, or preparing a web source for later wiki ingestion. Network extraction remains unavailable until an enforcing…
obsidian-markdown
Explain, draft, or validate Obsidian Flavored Markdown syntax: properties, wikilinks, embeds, callouts, tags, comments, highlights, block references, math, and Mermaid. Use when the user explicitly requests Obsidian note formatting or syntax help, not for general Markdown or broad vault operations.
wiki-fold
Create a bounded, extractive, structurally idempotent rollup of recent Obsidian wiki log entries, with dry-run preview by default and one optional transaction apply. Use for manual log compression without modifying child pages. Triggers: fold the log, run a fold, run wiki-fold, log rollup, roll up log entries, commit…