llm-competition-pipeline

llm-competition-pipeline is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent. It costs 165 tokens per session (1,751 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for entering LLM-based Kaggle competitions, where an open-source language model must solve a task under limits on models, internet access, GPU time, and available memory. It covers model choice, prompts, and whether fine-tuning is worthwhile.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to select a base model, design zero-shot or few-shot prompts, estimate GPU needs, and decide between prompting and fine-tuning.
Why use it?
It helps turn competition rules and hardware limits into a practical plan instead of choosing a model or training method blindly.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to select a base model, design zero-shot or few-shot prompts, estimate GPU needs, and decide between prompting and fine-tuning.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent --skill llm-competition-pipeline
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for llm-competition-pipeline

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for llm-competition-pipeline

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 165 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,751 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00165 $0.01751
Opus 5 $0.00082 $0.00875
Sonnet 5 $0.00033 $0.00350
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00175

Measured 11d ago against content hash 74004e01a394, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

llm-competition-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/examples/llm-competition-pipeline/SKILL.md · 189 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

LLM Competition Pipeline

Problem

LLM competitions (Industrial Automation, ARC-AGI-3, ai-agent-security) have unique constraints vs traditional ML:

  • Open-source models only (Qwen, DeepSeek, LLaMA — no GPT/Claude)
  • No internet at inference (all weights/data must be bundled)
  • GPU time limited (30h/week shared, 9-12h per notebook run)
  • Prompt engineering is 80% of the work (not model architecture)
  • Closed-book setting (no RAG, no tools, no retrieval)

The Pipeline (6 Stages)

Stage 1: Base Model Selection

Choose based on competition rules + GPU memory:

| Model | Params | VRAM (FP8) | Speed | Use Case |
|-------|--------|-------------|-------|----------|
| Qwen 2.5-7B | 7B | ~8GB | Fast | MCQ, classification |
| Qwen 3.6-27B | 27B | ~28GB | Medium | Reasoning, ARC-AGI-3 |
| DeepSeek-R1 | 7B/14B | ~8-16GB | Fast | Math, logic |
| LLaMA-3.1-8B | 8B | ~8GB | Fast | General purpose |

Decision factors:
  □ Competition rule: which model families are allowed?
  □ VRAM budget: Kaggle T4 = 16GB, P100 = 16GB, dual T4 = 30GB
  □ Inference time: 7B ~ 1-2s/query, 27B ~ 5-10s/query
  □ Task type: reasoning → larger, classification → smaller

Stage 2: Prompt Engineering

Start simple, then add complexity:

Level 0 — Zero-shot:
  "Answer the following question: {question}\nAnswer:"

Level 1 — Instruction:
  "You are an expert in {domain}. Read the passage and answer.
   Passage: {passage}
   Question: {question}
   Provide only the letter of the correct answer."

Level 2 — Few-shot (3-5 examples):
  "Here are examples of correct answers:
   Example 1: {input} → {output}
   Example 2: {input} → {output}
   Example 3: {input} → {output}
   Now answer: {question}"

Level 3 — Chain-of-thought:
  "Think step by step, then give the final answer."

Level 4 — Dynamic few-shot (retrieve relevant examples):
  For each test question, retrieve the most similar training examples
  and include them as few-shot context.

Key rule: Each level adds latency. Level 0 is fastest. Only escalate if OOF accuracy improves by >2%.

Read the full file on GitHub · 189 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 189 lines · 165 tokens per session scan A 74004e01a394

Subscribe to this mod's changes

llm-competition-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent (5 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 165 tokens to every session and 1,751 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prompt-scanner

A scanner for text sent to an AI agent, looking for prompt injection and jailbreak attempts. Prompt injection is text that tries to override an agent's instructions; a jailbreak tries to bypass its safety limits.

alibaba/anolisa · 103 tokens

context-optimization

Optimize effective context capacity through compression, masking, caching, and partitioning strategies. Use when the user asks to reduce token costs, improve context efficiency, implement KV-cache optimization, or extend context-window effectiveness.

LuizEduPP/Rememb · 45 tokens

ai-ml-engineering

AI/ML Engineering Review: Reviews AI/ML systems for production readiness — model serving, MLOps pipelines, LLM integration patterns, prompt engineering, evaluation frameworks, and responsible AI. Covers model deployment, feature stores, experiment tracking, monitoring/drift detection, and AI safety. Use when the user…

camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit · 112 tokens

agenta

LLM prompt management and evaluation platform. Version prompts, run A/B tests, evaluate with metrics, and deploy with confidence using Agenta's self-hosted solution.

diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill · 36 tokens

guidance

Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework.

braxtonROSE4/zorro-agent · 38 tokens

huggingface-hub

Hugging Face Hub CLI (hf) — search, download, and upload models and datasets, manage repos, query datasets with SQL, deploy inference endpoints, manage Spaces and buckets.

braxtonROSE4/zorro-agent · 43 tokens