Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent --skill llm-competition-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent/llm-competition-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00165 | $0.01751 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00082 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
llm-competition-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Competition Pipeline
Problem
LLM competitions (Industrial Automation, ARC-AGI-3, ai-agent-security) have unique constraints vs traditional ML:
- Open-source models only (Qwen, DeepSeek, LLaMA — no GPT/Claude)
- No internet at inference (all weights/data must be bundled)
- GPU time limited (30h/week shared, 9-12h per notebook run)
- Prompt engineering is 80% of the work (not model architecture)
- Closed-book setting (no RAG, no tools, no retrieval)
The Pipeline (6 Stages)
Stage 1: Base Model Selection
Choose based on competition rules + GPU memory:
| Model | Params | VRAM (FP8) | Speed | Use Case |
|-------|--------|-------------|-------|----------|
| Qwen 2.5-7B | 7B | ~8GB | Fast | MCQ, classification |
| Qwen 3.6-27B | 27B | ~28GB | Medium | Reasoning, ARC-AGI-3 |
| DeepSeek-R1 | 7B/14B | ~8-16GB | Fast | Math, logic |
| LLaMA-3.1-8B | 8B | ~8GB | Fast | General purpose |
Decision factors:
□ Competition rule: which model families are allowed?
□ VRAM budget: Kaggle T4 = 16GB, P100 = 16GB, dual T4 = 30GB
□ Inference time: 7B ~ 1-2s/query, 27B ~ 5-10s/query
□ Task type: reasoning → larger, classification → smaller
Stage 2: Prompt Engineering
Start simple, then add complexity:
Level 0 — Zero-shot:
"Answer the following question: {question}\nAnswer:"
Level 1 — Instruction:
"You are an expert in {domain}. Read the passage and answer.
Passage: {passage}
Question: {question}
Provide only the letter of the correct answer."
Level 2 — Few-shot (3-5 examples):
"Here are examples of correct answers:
Example 1: {input} → {output}
Example 2: {input} → {output}
Example 3: {input} → {output}
Now answer: {question}"
Level 3 — Chain-of-thought:
"Think step by step, then give the final answer."
Level 4 — Dynamic few-shot (retrieve relevant examples):
For each test question, retrieve the most similar training examples
and include them as few-shot context.
Key rule: Each level adds latency. Level 0 is fastest. Only escalate if OOF accuracy improves by >2%.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 189 lines · 165 tokens per session scan A 74004e01a394
llm-competition-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository topprismdata/cultivating-ml-agent (5 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 165 tokens to every session and 1,751 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-scanner
A scanner for text sent to an AI agent, looking for prompt injection and jailbreak attempts. Prompt injection is text that tries to override an agent's instructions; a jailbreak tries to bypass its safety limits.
context-optimization
Optimize effective context capacity through compression, masking, caching, and partitioning strategies. Use when the user asks to reduce token costs, improve context efficiency, implement KV-cache optimization, or extend context-window effectiveness.
ai-ml-engineering
AI/ML Engineering Review: Reviews AI/ML systems for production readiness — model serving, MLOps pipelines, LLM integration patterns, prompt engineering, evaluation frameworks, and responsible AI. Covers model deployment, feature stores, experiment tracking, monitoring/drift detection, and AI safety. Use when the user…
agenta
LLM prompt management and evaluation platform. Version prompts, run A/B tests, evaluate with metrics, and deploy with confidence using Agenta's self-hosted solution.
guidance
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework.
huggingface-hub
Hugging Face Hub CLI (hf) — search, download, and upload models and datasets, manage repos, query datasets with SQL, deploy inference endpoints, manage Spaces and buckets.