Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/toruai/toru-claude-agents/dev-securitynpx skills add ToruAI/toru-claude-agents --skill dev-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ToruAI/toru-claude-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/toruai/toru-claude-agents/dev-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/toruai/toru-claude-agents/dev-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/toruai/toru-claude-agents/dev-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00824 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
dev-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dev Security - Security Audit
Delegate to Sentinel for comprehensive security review.
Philosophy
"Every line of code is guilty until proven innocent."
Flow
1. Context Gathering
# What changed?
git diff --name-only HEAD~10 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only
# What's the scope?
ls -la
2. Invoke Sentinel
Delegate to Sentinel agent:
"Sentinel, security audit time.
Scope: {describe what changed or focus area}
Run your full checklist:
1. Secrets scan
2. Dependency audit
3. Injection vectors
4. Auth/authz review
5. Crypto check
Files changed: {list from git diff}
Be thorough. We're not shipping vulnerabilities."
3. Review Sentinel's Findings
Sentinel returns findings by severity:
- CRITICAL: Must fix before merge
- HIGH: Should fix before merge
- MEDIUM: Should fix soon
- LOW: Consider fixing
4. Action on Findings
If CRITICAL or HIGH found:
Security audit found issues:
CRITICAL:
- [Issue 1 with location and fix]
HIGH:
- [Issue 2 with location and fix]
Options:
1. Fix now (Bob will implement Sentinel's fixes)
2. Fix manually, run /dev-security again
3. Accept risk (requires explicit acknowledgment)
4. Get second opinion (run deeper audit)
If only MEDIUM/LOW:
Security audit passed with notes.
MEDIUM:
- [Issue with suggestion]
LOW:
- [Issue with suggestion]
These don't block shipping but should be tracked.
Add to backlog? (y/n)
If clean:
Security audit passed!
Sentinel says: "Huh. Someone actually read the OWASP guide. Respect."
Ready for:
- /dev-rc - Release candidate
- /dev-finish - Close the cycle
5. Log Results
If active dev-cycle session:
## Security Audit
- **Date**: {timestamp}
- **Status**: PASSED | PASSED_WITH_NOTES | FAILED
- **Critical**: 0
- **High**: 0
- **Medium**: 2
- **Low**: 1
### Findings
{Summary of what was found and resolved}
Focus Modes
Full Audit (default)
/dev-security
Everything: secrets, deps, code, config, infra
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 166 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A f40d5c17e31d
dev-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ToruAI/toru-claude-agents (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 824 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge-gaps
This skill should be used when the user asks about 'knowledge gaps', 'tool coverage', 'undocumented dependencies', 'undocumented tools', 'concept gaps', 'installed plugins', 'plugin coverage', 'undocumented skills', 'globally installed plugins/skills', 'what is installed on this machine', 'stale/outdated/drifted…
factory-db-migration
The operational discipline for running a destructive change against a production database — schema migrations, data backfills, one-shot RPCs, historical seed imports. Adjacent to factory-data-layer.md (schema design) and factory-deployment.md (where migrations execute in CI) — this skill is about the runbook around…
people-intel
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'research person', 'person intel', 'people intel', 'who is [person]', 'who created [project]', 'who maintains [package]', 'add person to knowledge graph', 'enrich person note', 'update person note', 'document [person]', 'create person note for [name]'. Researches a…
factory-api
API conventions for both server actions and tRPC builds. Covers the decision between them, per-mutation Zod input schemas, central router composition, pagination shape, multi-field search via Drizzle ilike + or(), mutation lifecycle hooks, conditional query enabling, stale-time defaults, error response shape and…
factory-ci
CI and pull-request review conventions. One canonical .github/workflows/ci.yml is the merge gate (typecheck, lint, test, build, claude-review); branch protection's required-checks list matches the job list 1:1; anthropics/claude-code-action@v1 reviews every PR against the factory-pitfalls.md checklist as a required…
factory-frontend
Frontend conventions distilled across builds. CRUD shape (DataTable + drawer with mode union), RowActions primitive, format helpers, heading tiers, semantic color tokens, query-key naming, component-library decision criteria (Mantine vs shadcn). Read when scaffolding any UI surface that touches lists, forms, or entity…