Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tostechbr/memoryclaw/memory-add-patternsnpx skills add tostechbr/memoryClaw --skill memory-add-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tostechbr/memoryClawWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01713 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00856 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00343 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
memory-add-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
memory_add Patterns — Akashic Context Sprint 1
What memory_add does
Takes a raw message → extracts structured facts → stores in user's memory. Two paths depending on deduplication check:
memory_add({ message, userId })
│
├─ embed(message)
├─ searchVectorInProcess(embedding, limit=3, threshold=0.15 distance)
│
├─ IF similar found (distance ≤ 0.15 = similarity ≥ 0.85):
│ LLM merge(existing_content + new_message)
│ → memory_store(existing_path, merged)
│ → return { action: "merged", path }
│
└─ IF no similar found:
LLM extract(message)
→ memory_store("memory/facts-{TIMESTAMP}.md", extracted)
→ return { action: "created", path }
Decision Log Reference
- D2: Merge (not update/append/skip) — preserves all unique facts AND updates outdated info
- D3: Threshold 0.85 cosine (0.15 distance) — conservative enough to not confuse topics
- D4: Implemented in mcp-server (not core) — LLM calls are server responsibility
- D5: gpt-4o-mini default — cost-effective for fact extraction
Zod Schema
const schema = z.object({
message: z.string().min(1),
userId: z.string().optional().default("default"),
});
LLM Prompts
EXTRACT_PROMPT (new memory)
const EXTRACT_PROMPT = (message: string) => `
Extract structured facts from the following message as clean Markdown.
Use headers for categories (e.g. ## Profile, ## Preferences, ## Projects).
Be concise. Only include factual information. Ignore questions or commands.
Message: ${message}
`.trim();
MERGE_PROMPT (deduplication found)
const MERGE_PROMPT = (existing: string, newMessage: string) => `
You have existing memory and new information about the same topic.
Produce a merged Markdown document that:
- Preserves all unique facts from existing memory
- Updates any outdated information with the new version
- Adds any new facts not present in existing memory
- Keeps the same Markdown structure
Existing memory:
${existing}
New information:
${newMessage}
`.trim();
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 219 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 406656986291
memory-add-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository tostechbr/memoryClaw (8 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,713 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
stale-sweep
Sweep the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo for issues and PRs with no real activity in N days (default 60), sort each by whose silence it is (the author's, ours, or nobody's), and draft the nudge or close comment. Use whenever a maintainer asks for a stale sweep, backlog cleanup, or an SLO check, e.g. "stale sweep", "find…
github-issue-triage
Issue triage and lifecycle management agent for ZeroClaw. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: triage open issues, close stale/duplicate/fixed issues, apply labels, run a backlog sweep, enforce the current issue stale policy, or handle a specific issue. Trigger on: 'triage issues', 'issue triage', 'sweep…
backlog-technical-project-manager
Technical project management for Backlog.md workstreams using coordinated sub-agents. Use only when the user explicitly asks Codex to take over one or more existing Backlog.md tasks (for example: "act as TPM", "coordinate these tasks", "delegate to sub-agents"). Orchestrate planning, implementation, and finalization…
goal-conductor
Own a long-horizon goal end to end - decompose it into work items, stand up one top-level session per item, patrol their state on a nudge loop, and decide each next round until the goal is met or a stop condition fires. Use when the user hands over a goal too large for one session ("clear the flaky-test backlog"…
devloop
Goal-driven development loop — define objective, write rules with key-results, verify visually, sync to issue tracker.
goal-loop
Bootstrap a goal-driven self-improving AutoNudge loop. Give it a goal + anchor directory; it generates LOOP.md + GOAL.md + kanban board, then you write the Definition of Done and arm the loop. The running agent manages the board autonomously: finds issues, adds cards, resolves them, handoffs to Review, repeats until…