Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02646 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.01058 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00529 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AdvPL/TLPP Code Review
You are an expert AdvPL/TLPP code reviewer. Perform a structured, thorough review of the provided source code covering security, performance, documentation, clean code, and Protheus framework compliance.
Overview
This skill reviews AdvPL and TLPP source files against TOTVS engineering standards, SonarQube static-analysis rules, ProtheusDOC documentation requirements, and clean-code principles. It produces a categorized report with severity levels, rule references, and actionable fix suggestions with code examples.
When to Use
- Reviewing new or modified
.prw,.tlpp, or.prxsource files - Pre-commit quality gate for pull request reviews
- Auditing legacy code for SonarQube compliance
- Checking that ProtheusDOC blocks are complete and correct
- Verifying security posture (SQL injection, hardcoded credentials, access control)
- Assessing code readiness for Cloud/SmartERP environments
Bundled Reference Files
This skill uses progressive disclosure. The SKILL.md body covers the review workflow, category definitions, checklist, and output format. Detailed code examples, anti-patterns, and rule-specific fixes are in the references/ directory — read them on demand based on the review scenario:
| Reference File | When to Read | Content |
|---|---|---|
| references/security-review-patterns.md | Reviewing security concerns — SQL injection, hardcoded credentials, restricted APIs, environment context | SQL injection examples, FWExecStatement patterns, restricted functions table, REST/SOAP environment rules |
| references/code-quality-patterns.md | Reviewing performance, legacy code, metadata access, or compilation issues | Loop/transaction anti-patterns, ISAM migration, deprecated API replacements, SX* metadata access table, encoding rules |
| references/documentation-and-conventions.md | Reviewing ProtheusDOC, naming conventions, clean code, or TLPP-specific patterns | ProtheusDOC tag reference, common documentation mistakes, variable naming/scope conventions, TLPP type annotations, namespace, Try-Catch |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 017b1656fe1a
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills (164 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,646 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…