Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills --skill langgraph-architecture-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills/langgraph-architecture-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills/langgraph-architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills/langgraph-architecture-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills/langgraph-architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills/langgraph-architecture-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.01993 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
langgraph-architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LangGraph Architecture Review
Outcome
Turn the project's real LangGraph code into a traceable architecture review:
- a Mermaid graph grounded in source locations;
- state, node, edge, persistence, HITL, model, tool, and side-effect boundaries;
- a feature-level explanation of how the graph delivers the user's task;
- prioritized improvements with evidence, expected effect, risk, and verification.
The source code and compiled graph are evidence. A plausible diagram is not evidence.
Ownership
Default to review-only: inspect and report without editing project code. Only modify a graph when the user explicitly requests implementation after reviewing the architecture.
The named output is LANGGRAPH_ARCHITECTURE_PACKET. Read references/review-contract.md before writing the final report. Read references/upstream-sources.md when the user asks for current APIs, latest architecture, framework comparison, persistence, HITL, or migration guidance.
Workflow
CREATE A TODO LIST FOR THE TASKS BELOW:
-
Resolve the project root. Read applicable
AGENTS.mdand architecture docs. If no readable project exists, report a blocker and stop. -
Find LangGraph dependencies and imports. Record the installed Python package version; never infer the version from training data.
-
If the user asks for “latest” or current best practices, check the official release and live documentation listed in
references/upstream-sources.md. If network access fails, mark the comparisonlocal-onlyinstead of guessing. -
Run the static inventory from the project root:
python /absolute/path/to/langgraph-architecture-review/scripts/inspect_langgraph.py . \ --output /tmp/langgraph-architecture.md \ --json /tmp/langgraph-architecture.json -
Read every discovered graph entrypoint, state schema, node callable, router, persistence configuration, and graph-facing API. If the scanner misses dynamic construction, add that evidence manually with file and line references.
-
Use runtime introspection only when importing the graph is demonstrably side-effect free. Prefer the public API:
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 371 B
- assets/icon.png 794 B
- assets/icon.svg 544 B
- README.md 3.4 KB
- README.zh.md 3.0 KB
- references/review-contract.md 2.8 KB
- references/upstream-sources.md 2.9 KB
- scripts/inspect_langgraph.py 26 KB runs code
- scripts/test_inspect_langgraph.py 2.7 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_report.py 1.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 164 lines · 145 tokens per session scan A 38532c320f23
langgraph-architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tranfu-labs/tranfu-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 1,993 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…