Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill context-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranhieutt/software_development_departmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/context-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/context-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/context-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/context-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/context-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01186 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
context-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
1. Overview
Context engineering bridges the gap between static training data and dynamic reality. Context Stuffing (jamming volume without intent) degrades reasoning, increases noise, and leads to hallucinations. Context Engineering treats AI attention as a scarce resource and allocates it deliberately through structure, bounded contexts, and intelligent memory retrieval (RAG / MCP Supermemory). Without this skill, the AI suffers from "Context Hoarding Disorder," leading to goal drift, high latency, and poor execution quality.
2. When to Use
Activate this skill immediately upon detecting the following signs:
- Sign 1: User pastes a massive block of uncurated documents entirely into the context window (e.g., full PRDs, full codebases, thousands of lines of logs).
- Sign 2: The AI's outputs start to become vague, hedged, or inconsistent despite having "all the context", or when the context window is clearly overflowing.
- Sign 3: The user wants to start a multi-step complex workflow spanning many files and iterations.
- Implicit Command: User types
/contextor/memory.
3. Strict Process
ULTIMATUM: You are an Agent. You DO NOT have the right to ignore, truncate, or alter the order of these steps, even if you think "the model has a 1 million token context limit anyway."
- [Step 1 - Intent & Boundary Falsification]: Identify exactly what decision the provided context supports. Apply the falsification test: "If I exclude [context element X], what specific failure will occur in [decision Y]?" If there is no concrete failure, the context must be rejected or removed from the active window.
- [Step 2 - Persist vs. Retrieve Classification]: Separate the information. Core constraints and glossary definitions remain in active context. Episodic, project-specific, or historical data must be offloaded and retrieved only when queried. Use
mcp_supermemory_recallfor historical lookups instead of keeping them in the prompt. - [Step 3 - The R-P-R-I Cycle Execution]:
- Research: Gather necessary information.
- Plan: Synthesize findings into a high-density
PLAN.mdorSPEC.md. - Reset: Save crucial lessons to memory using
mcp_supermemory_memoryand explicitly ask the user to clear the context window (start a new chat) or summarize everything to drop the past context rot. - Implement: Execute purely based on the dense plan.
- [Step 4 - Storage & Consolidation]: Upon finishing a milestone, write the generalized knowledge or operational principles into
mcp_supermemory_memory.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 2da3d3351ebb
context-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository tranhieutt/software_development_department (73 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,186 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
calibrating
Use after a knowledge-work deliverable ships or gets human edits. Triggers on "that draft worked", "they rewrote half of it", "remember this for next time", or when the user returns with feedback on a shipped doc. Not for code retrospectives.
bochi
A Japanese-speaking thinking and context assistant for the Mac command line. It helps with notes, light conversation, idea development, summaries, and routing deeper discussions to Discord.
cm-continuity
Working memory protocol — maintains context across sessions via CONTINUITY.md. Inspired by Loki Mode. Read at turn start, update at turn end. Captures mistakes and learnings to prevent repeating errors.
cm-continuity
Working memory protocol — maintains context across sessions via CONTINUITY.md. Inspired by Loki Mode. Read at turn start, update at turn end. Captures mistakes and learnings to prevent repeating errors.
cm-notebooklm
Sync high-value dev knowledge (skills, decisions, lessons) into Google NotebookLM for cloud recall, podcasts, and flashcards. Pairs with Dockit/deep-search. Use for NotebookLM, nlm, knowledge base, skill sync, or cross-machine AI memory.
cm-continuity
Working memory protocol — maintains context across sessions via CONTINUITY.md. Inspired by Loki Mode. Read at turn start, update at turn end. Captures mistakes and learnings to prevent repeating errors.