Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill launch-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranhieutt/software_development_departmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/launch-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/launch-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/launch-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/launch-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/launch-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00960 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
launch-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When this skill is invoked:
Explicit invocation only: This skill should only run when the user explicitly requests it with
/launch-checklist. Do not auto-invoke based on context matching.
-
Read the argument for the launch date or
dry-runmode. Dry-run mode generates the checklist without creating sign-off entries. -
Gather project context:
- Read
CLAUDE.mdfor tech stack, release surfaces, and team structure - Read the latest milestone in
production/milestones/ - Read any existing release checklist in
production/releases/ - Read any launch, support, or communications notes in
docs/launch/,docs/runbooks/, orproduction/releases/if they exist
- Read
-
Scan codebase health:
- Count
TODO,FIXME,HACKcomments and their locations - Check for any
console.log,print(), or debug output left in production code - Check for placeholder assets or copy (search for
placeholder,temp_,WIP_) - Check for hardcoded test/dev values (localhost, test credentials, debug flags)
- Count
-
Generate the launch checklist:
# Launch Checklist: [Product Title]
Target Launch: [Date or DRY RUN]
Generated: [Date]
---
## 1. Code Readiness
### Build Health
- [ ] Clean build or release artifact generated for all target surfaces
- [ ] Zero release-blocking compiler or linter errors
- [ ] All unit tests passing
- [ ] All integration tests passing
- [ ] End-to-end or smoke tests passing for critical user journeys
- [ ] Schema migrations tested with rollback or recovery plan
- [ ] Release version correctly set and tagged in source control
- [ ] Performance and reliability benchmarks within agreed targets
### Code Quality
- [ ] TODO count: [N] (zero required for launch, or documented exceptions)
- [ ] FIXME count: [N] (zero required)
- [ ] HACK count: [N] (each must have documented justification)
- [ ] No unintended debug output in production code
- [ ] No hardcoded dev/test values
- [ ] All feature flags reviewed for launch defaults
- [ ] Error handling covers all critical paths
- [ ] Crash reporting and structured logging integrated and verified
- [ ] Dependency vulnerabilities triaged and accepted risk documented
### Security and Privacy
- [ ] No exposed API keys or credentials in source or build artifacts
- [ ] Authentication, authorization, and input validation verified on public endpoints
- [ ] Network communication secured (TLS, signed webhooks, secret rotation as applicable)
- [ ] Abuse protection, rate limiting, or bot controls enabled where required
- [ ] Privacy policy and data handling compliance verified
- [ ] Backup and restore path validated for stateful systems
---
## 2. Product Readiness
### Functional Scope
- [ ] All launch-scope features implemented or explicitly deferred
- [ ] Critical user journeys tested end-to-end
- [ ] Admin, support, and internal operational workflows verified
- [ ] Billing, notifications, integrations, and webhooks tested if applicable
- [ ] Data import/export, retention, or deletion flows verified if applicable
- [ ] Release notes and known issues drafted
### UX, Content, and Localization
- [ ] All placeholder copy and visuals replaced
- [ ] All user-facing text proofread
- [ ] No hardcoded strings (all externalized for localization)
- [ ] All supported languages translated and verified
- [ ] Text fits UI in all supported languages
- [ ] Help content, onboarding, and empty states reviewed
- [ ] Customer-facing documentation links are current
---
## 3. Quality Assurance
### Testing
- [ ] Full regression test suite passed
- [ ] Zero Sev1 (Critical) bugs open
- [ ] Zero Sev2 (High/Major) bugs open, or documented exceptions with owner approval
- [ ] Smoke test passed in staging or release candidate environment
- [ ] User acceptance or stakeholder sign-off captured
- [ ] Edge cases tested (no network, expired session, low storage, rate limits, retries)
- [ ] Backup/restore or disaster recovery drill completed if applicable
### Accessibility and Compliance
- [ ] Accessibility basics covered for target surfaces
- [ ] Consent, privacy, and legal notices reviewed
- [ ] Audit logging or regulated workflow checks verified if required
- [ ] App store or platform policy requirements met, if applicable
### Performance and Reliability
- [ ] Response time or startup time within budget
- [ ] Memory and CPU usage within budget
- [ ] Queue lag, background jobs, and async workflows within targets
- [ ] No sustained error-rate spikes during release candidate soak window
- [ ] Capacity and scaling assumptions reviewed for launch traffic
---
## 4. Distribution and Customer-Facing Assets
### Release Assets
- [ ] Changelog complete and proofread
- [ ] Release notes complete and customer-appropriate
- [ ] Version numbers aligned across app, API, docs, and packaging
- [ ] Download links, package names, or deployment targets finalized
### Launch Communications
- [ ] Status page messaging prepared
- [ ] Customer announcement drafted
- [ ] In-app banner, modal, or changelog entry prepared if needed
- [ ] Support macros / FAQ updated
- [ ] Sales, customer success, and internal stakeholders briefed
### Public Metadata
- [ ] Marketing site or product page copy updated
- [ ] Screenshots or release visuals current
- [ ] Pricing, packaging, and plan entitlements verified
- [ ] App store listing metadata current, if applicable
---
## 5. Infrastructure
### Production Readiness
- [ ] Production infrastructure provisioned and sized for launch
- [ ] Database backups configured and restore tested
- [ ] CDN, cache invalidation, and asset delivery configured where applicable
- [ ] Feature flag rollout strategy documented
- [ ] Secrets and access reviews completed
- [ ] Deployment and rollback runbooks current
### Analytics and Monitoring
- [ ] Analytics pipeline verified and receiving expected events
- [ ] Crash reporting active and dashboard accessible
- [ ] Monitoring dashboards live for core technical and business metrics
- [ ] Alerts configured for critical thresholds
- [ ] Incident escalation path and owners documented
---
## 6. Support and Operations
### Team Readiness
- [ ] On-call schedule set for first 72 hours post-launch
- [ ] Incident response playbook reviewed by the team
- [ ] Hotfix pipeline tested
- [ ] Communication plan for launch issues documented
- [ ] Support team briefed on known issues and escalation path
### Launch Day Plan
- [ ] Go-live sequence documented step by step
- [ ] Rollback decision criteria documented
- [ ] War room or launch channel established
- [ ] Launch monitoring dashboard bookmarked by all leads
- [ ] Checkpoint times defined for launch-day review
---
## Go / No-Go Decision
**Overall Status**: [READY / NOT READY / CONDITIONAL]
### Blocking Items
[List any items that must be resolved before launch]
### Conditional Items
[List items that have documented workarounds or accepted risk]
### Sign-Offs Required
- [ ] Product Owner - Scope and customer readiness
- [ ] Engineering Lead - Technical health and stability
- [ ] QA Lead - Quality and test coverage
- [ ] Release Manager - Deployment and rollback readiness
- [ ] Security / Compliance Owner - Security and data handling
- [ ] Support Lead - Support and incident readiness
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 221 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 72545ee6605a
launch-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository tranhieutt/software_development_department (72 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,921 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage
Apply a formal state machine to issues — assign category (bug/enhancement/question/spike) and state (needs-triage → needs-info → ready-for-agent → ready-for-human → wontfix). Issues marked ready-for-agent become inputs to supergraph:plan. Use when processing a backlog, reviewing new issues, or preparing work for…
task-code
A two-phase workflow for breaking coding work into tracked subtasks and progress records. It applies rules from the project's CLAUDE.md file, which is a set of instructions for the coding assistant.
cm-sprint-bus
Use to run the full sprint pipeline: brainstorm → plan → design → tdd → build → review → qa → security → ship → monitor → retro.
adopt
Take a folder that already holds research — papers, notes, code, half-written drafts — into MAGI, without breaking what is already there.
syndic
Gère un parc de copropriétés en France avec vue portfolio consolidée. Couvre administration, comptabilité (décret 2005, plan comptable copro, 5 annexes), assemblées générales (convocation, PV, notification), appels de fonds, travaux, fournisseurs, recouvrement d'impayés et transition de syndic. Maîtrise les majorités…
estimating-and-contingency
Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…