scope-check

scope-check is a skill for Claude Code from tranhieutt/software_development_department. It costs 51 tokens per session (1,003 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A scope-checking skill compares a feature or sprint’s current work with its original plan and lists additions, removals, and possible bloat.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a feature, sprint, or milestone against its planned work and recommend scope reductions.
Why use it?
It helps teams spot when extra work has expanded a plan and decide what to cut before delivery is delayed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to review a feature, sprint, or milestone against its planned work and recommend scope reductions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill scope-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tranhieutt/software_development_department

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for scope-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for scope-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tranhieutt/software_development_department/scope-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,003 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.01003
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00502
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00201
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00100

Measured 9d ago against content hash 87925ad6a5bb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scope-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/scope-check/SKILL.md · 94 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

When this skill is invoked:

  1. Read the original plan — Find the relevant document:

    • If a feature name: read the design doc from design/docs/
    • If a sprint number: read the sprint plan from production/sprints/
    • If a milestone: read the milestone definition from production/milestones/
  2. Read the current state — Check what has actually been implemented or is in progress:

    • Scan the codebase for files related to the feature/sprint
    • Read git log for commits related to this work
    • Check for TODO comments that indicate unfinished scope additions
  3. Compare original vs current scope:

    ## Scope Check: [Feature/Sprint Name]
    Generated: [Date]
    
    ### Original Scope
    [List of items from the original plan]
    
    ### Current Scope
    [List of items currently implemented or in progress]
    
    ### Scope Additions (not in original plan)
    | Addition | Who Added | When | Justified? | Effort |
    |----------|-----------|------|------------|--------|
    | [item] | [commit/person] | [date] | [Yes/No/Unclear] | [S/M/L] |
    
    ### Scope Removals (in original but dropped)
    | Removed Item | Reason | Impact |
    |-------------|--------|--------|
    | [item] | [why removed] | [what's affected] |
    
    ### Bloat Score
    - Original items: [N]
    - Current items: [N]
    - Items added: [N] (+[X]%)
    - Items removed: [N]
    - Net scope change: [+/-N] ([X]%)
    
    ### Risk Assessment
    - **Schedule Risk**: [Low/Medium/High] — [explanation]
    - **Quality Risk**: [Low/Medium/High] — [explanation]
    - **Integration Risk**: [Low/Medium/High] — [explanation]
    
    ### Recommendations
    1. **Cut**: [Items that should be removed to stay on schedule]
    2. **Defer**: [Items that can move to a future sprint/version]
    3. **Keep**: [Additions that are genuinely necessary]
    4. **Flag**: [Items that need a decision from producer/creative-director]
    
  4. Output the scope check with a clear verdict:

    • On Track: Scope within 10% of original
    • Minor Creep: 10-25% scope increase — manageable with adjustments
    • Significant Creep: 25-50% scope increase — need to cut or extend timeline
    • Out of Control: >50% scope increase — stop and re-plan

Rules

  • Scope creep is additions without corresponding cuts or timeline extensions
  • Not all additions are bad — some are discovered requirements. But they must be acknowledged and accounted for.
  • When recommending cuts, prioritize preserving the core user experience over nice-to-haves
  • Always quantify scope changes — "it feels bigger" is not actionable, "+35% items" is

Read the full file on GitHub · 94 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 94 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 87925ad6a5bb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scope-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository tranhieutt/software_development_department (72 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,003 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories