debate-practice-coach

debate-practice-coach is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from travisjneuman/.claude. It costs 45 tokens per session (2,862 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An interactive coach for practising debates and improving arguments. It gives structured feedback, suggests opposing points, identifies faulty reasoning, and uses scoring guides.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare debate positions, build claims and counterarguments, analyse reasoning, practise responses, and assess speaking or writing performance.
Why use it?
It helps reveal weak evidence, missing assumptions, and logical mistakes before you present an argument to other people.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to prepare debate positions, build claims and counterarguments, analyse reasoning, practise responses, and assess speaking or writing performance.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill debate-practice-coach
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for debate-practice-coach

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for debate-practice-coach

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/debate-practice-coach.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 45 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,862 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00045 $0.02862
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.01431
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00572
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00286

Measured 9d ago against content hash dc7dc00e06ef, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

debate-practice-coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/debate-practice-coach/SKILL.md · 333 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Debate Practice Coach

Frameworks for structured argumentation, counterargument development, logical analysis, and persuasive communication practice with objective scoring.

Argument Structure

Toulmin Model of Argumentation

ARGUMENT BUILDER (Toulmin Model):

CLAIM:        [Your main assertion]
              What are you arguing?

GROUNDS:      [Evidence and data supporting the claim]
              What facts back this up?

WARRANT:      [The logical connection between grounds and claim]
              Why does this evidence support your claim?

BACKING:      [Support for the warrant itself]
              Why should we trust this reasoning?

QUALIFIER:    [Degree of certainty — most, some, probably]
              How strong is this claim?

REBUTTAL:     [Conditions where the claim doesn't hold]
              When would this argument fail?

EXAMPLE:
  Claim:      "Remote work increases productivity for knowledge workers."
  Grounds:    "Stanford study showed 13% productivity increase in remote workers."
  Warrant:    "Fewer interruptions and commute elimination allow deeper focus."
  Backing:    "Multiple studies confirm interruptions cost 23 min to recover from."
  Qualifier:  "For most knowledge workers in roles not requiring physical presence."
  Rebuttal:   "May not apply to new employees needing mentorship or highly
               collaborative creative roles."

Argument Types

Type Structure Best For Example
Deductive If premises true → conclusion must be true Logical proofs, policy arguments "All citizens must follow laws. X is a citizen. Therefore X must follow laws."
Inductive Specific observations → general conclusion Scientific arguments, trend analysis "In 50 studies, X led to Y. Therefore X likely causes Y."
Abductive Best available explanation Diagnostic arguments "The best explanation for these symptoms is condition X."
Analogical Similar case → similar conclusion Precedent-based arguments "Policy X worked in Country A, which shares characteristics with Country B."
Causal X causes Y Policy proposals, problem-solution "Increasing minimum wage will reduce poverty because..."

Read the full file on GitHub · 333 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 333 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A dc7dc00e06ef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

debate-practice-coach is a skill published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,862 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

stride-analysis-patterns

Apply STRIDE methodology to systematically identify threats. Use when analyzing system security, conducting threat modeling sessions, or creating security documentation.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 30 tokens

blind-spot-pass

Use before starting work in a domain you don't know well, to surface the "unknown unknowns" — the things you don't even know to ask about — and learn just enough to prompt and decide well. Implements the "blind spot pass" pattern from Anthropic's Fable "finding your unknowns" field guide. Triggers when you say "I'm…

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 221 tokens

prompts-chat

Use when searching, installing, or improving AI skills and prompts via prompts.chat or skills.sh. Triggers on skill search, prompt lookup, install skill, improve prompt, prompts.chat.

sangrokjung/claude-forge · 41 tokens

stuck

Diagnoses a broken course setup by reading the folder, so the student never has to describe the problem in English. Takes no argument. Reports which class they are on and which files are filled, then names one blocker and one fix: Claude Code opened at the wrong level, .claude/skills/ missing, skills not loading…

mshadmanrahman/claude-for-designers · 161 tokens

plan-review-architecture

Architecture-dimension reviewer for written plans. Use when running plan-review or directly when an architectural review is wanted. Activate for keywords like "architecture review", "data flow", "failure modes", "rollback", "edge cases", "test matrix". Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10, produces ranked fixes. Always cite…

duthaho/claudekit · 87 tokens

plan-review-experience

Experience-dimension reviewer for written plans (UX + DX). Use when running plan-review or directly when an experience review is wanted. Activate for keywords like "UX review", "DX review", "experience review", "error states", "API ergonomics", "developer experience", "user states". Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10…

duthaho/claudekit · 121 tokens